gpntbНаучные и технические библиотекиScientific and Technical Libraries1027-36892686-8601Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology10.33186/1027-3689-2022-11-56-81gpntb-1037Research ArticleНАУКОМЕТРИЯ. БИБЛИОМЕТРИЯSCIENTOMETRICS. BIBLIOMETRICSМетодика формирования выборки публикаций для подготовки научных обзоровMethodology for selecting publications for scientific reviewsМалышеваА. В.MalyshevaA. V.

Малышева Александра Валерьевна – младший научный сотрудник лаборатории наукометрии и научных коммуникаций

Москва

Aleksandra V. Malysheva – Junior Researcher, Laboratory for Scientometrics and Scholarly Communications

Moscow

bag_bala@mail.ruКосяковД. В.KosyakovD. V.

Косяков Денис Викторович – заместитель заведующего лаборатории наукометрии и научных коммуникаций

Москва

Denis V. Kosyakov – Deputy Head of the Laboratory for Scientometrics and Scholarly Communications

Moscow

kosyakov@sciencepulse.ruГуськовА. Е.GuskovA. E.

Гуськов Андрей Евгеньевич – кандидат технических наук, заведующий лабораторией наукометрии и научных коммуникаций

Москва

Andrey E. Guskov – Cand. Sc. (Engineering), Head of the Laboratory for Scientometrics and Scholarly Communications

Moscow

guskov.andrey@gmail.comРоссийский научно-исследовательский институт экономики, политики и права в научно-технической сфереРоссияRussian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and TechnologyRussian Federation2022141220220115681Copyright © Малышева А.В., Косяков Д.В., Гуськов А.Е., 20222022Малышева А.В., Косяков Д.В., Гуськов А.Е.Malysheva A.V., Kosyakov D.V., Guskov A.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ntb.gpntb.ru/jour/article/view/1037

Поиск и отбор публикаций для подготовки обзорной статьи являются задачей, решение которой находится на стыке между наукой и искусством. С увеличением публикационного потока исследователям всё сложнее выделять из него релевантные работы, имеющие определённую значимость для научного сообщества. Методологический подход, описанный в статье, позволяет систематизировать подбор публикаций для обзоров, значительно сократив число случайных ошибок и субъективных отклонений. Он упорядочивает процедуры подготовки стартовой выборки, её расширения, усечения и анализа, которые выполняются в несколько итераций, по их результатам формируются финальная выборка, её аналитические характеристики и формальный протокол подготовки. В статье описаны содержание методики и пример применения для тематики «привлечённый библиотекарь» («embedded librarian»). На этом примере продемонстрированы преимущества предложенного подхода по сравнению с традиционным методом поиска по ключевым словам: возможность использования различных вариантов поисковых стратегий, обеспечение их воспроизводимости и большей полноты результирующей выборки. Описанная методика может применяться в научных и научно-технических библиотеках в целях развития сервисов для информационного сопровождения исследовательской деятельности.

The task of searching and selecting publications for scientific reviews is located on the intersection of science and art. The increasing publication flow has made it all harder to reveal relevant and important papers for scientific community. The methodological approach being described enables to organize selecting publications for reviews while decreasing accidental mistakes and subjective declinations; it is to structure primary selection with its further expansion, reduction and analysis, that can be accomplished in several iterations resulting in the final selection, its analytical features and formalized protocol. The authors describe the method structure and provide the example for the subject “embedded librarian”. This example demonstrates the advantages of the approach as compared to the traditional search by keywords: various variants of search strategies are applicable; their repeatability and exhaustiveness of resulted selection. The method can be applied in academic and sci-tech libraries to develop their services supporting science and research.

обзорсистематический обзорметодика подготовки обзорованализ цитированияпоисковые стратегииядро из релевантных публикацийembedded librarianreviewsystematic reviewcitation analysismethodology for the preparation of reviewssearch strategiesrelevant publications coreembedded librarianReferencesYu Z., Menzies T. FAST2: An intelligent assistant for finding relevant papers // Expert Systems with Applications. 2019. Vol. 120. P. 57–71.Yu Z., Menzies T. FAST2: An intelligent assistant for finding relevant papers // Expert Systems with Applications. 2019. Vol. 120. P. 57–71.Egger M. et. al. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study // Health Technol Assessment. 2003. Vol. 1. № 7. P. 1–76.Egger M. et. al. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study // Health Technol Assessment. 2003. Vol. 1. № 7. P. 1–76.Song F. et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases // Health Technol Assessment. 2010. Vol. 14. № 8. P. III, IX–XI, 1–193.Song F. et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases // Health Technol Assessment. 2010. Vol. 14. № 8. P. III, IX–XI, 1–193.Sideri S., Papageorgiou S. N., Eliades T. Registration in the international pro-spective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018. Vol. 100. C. 103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.003Sideri S., Papageorgiou S. N., Eliades T. Registration in the international pro-spective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018. Vol. 100. C. 103– 110. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.003Liberati A. et. al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009. Vol. 62. № 10. P. e1–e34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006Liberati A. et. al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009. Vol. 62. № 10. P. e1–e34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006Bagirova A. V., Kosyakov D. V., Guskov A. E. The 50 Most Highly Cited Reviews of 2013– 2017 // Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2021. Vol. 48. № 3. P. 168–184.Bagirova A. V., Kosyakov D. V., Guskov A. E. The 50 Most Highly Cited Reviews of 2013– 2017 // Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2021. Vol. 48. № 3. P. 168–184.Buchkremer R. et. al. The application of artificial intelligence technologies as a substitute for reading and to support and enhance the authoring of scientific review articles // IEEE Access. 2019. Vol. 7. P. 65263–65276. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2917719Buchkremer R. et. al. The application of artificial intelligence technologies as a substitute for reading and to support and enhance the authoring of scientific review articles // IEEE Access. 2019. Vol. 7. P. 65263–65276. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2917719Chen C. Cascading citation expansion // Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice. 2018. Vol. 2. № 6. P. 6–23.Chen C. Cascading citation expansion // Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice. 2018. Vol. 2. № 6. P. 6–23.Chen C., Song M. Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews // PLoS ONE. 2019. Vol. 10. № 14. P. e0223994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223994Chen C., Song M. Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews // PLoS ONE. 2019. Vol. 10. № 14. P. e0223994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223994Каменская М. А. Эволюция информационно библиотечного обслуживания: вопросы терминологии // Научно-техническая информация. Серия 1: Организация и методика информационной работы. 2016. № 8. С. 24–33.Kamenskaia M. A. E`voliutciia informatcionno bibliotechnogo obsluzhivaniia: voprosy` terminologii // Nauchno-tekhnicheskaia informatciia. Seriia 1: Organizatciia i metodika informatcionnoi` raboty`. 2016. № 8. S. 24–33.Галявиева М. С. Научные библиотеки в информационном сопровождении и поддержке научных исследований: основные тенденции // Труды ГПНТБ СО РАН. 2017. № 121. С. 221–227.Galiavieva M. S. Nauchny`e biblioteki v informatcionnom soprovozhdenii i podderzhke nauchny`kh issledovanii`: osnovny`e tendentcii // Trudy` GPNTB SO RAN. 2017. № 121. S. 221–227.Kesselman M. A., Watstein S. B. Creating opportunities: Embedded librarians // Journal of Library Administration. 2009. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 383–400. doi: 10.1080/01930820902832538Kesselman M. A., Watstein S. B. Creating opportunities: Embedded librarians // Journal of Library Administration. 2009. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 383–400. doi: 10.1080/01930820902832538Drewes K., Hoffman N. Academic embedded librarianship: An introduction // Public service quarterly. 2010. Vol. 6. № 2–3. P. 75–82. doi: 10.1080/15228959.2010.498773Drewes K., Hoffman N. Academic embedded librarianship: An introduction // Public service quarterly. 2010. Vol. 6. № 2–3. P. 75–82. doi: 10.1080/15228959.2010.498773Ziede E. J. In bed with the military: First Amendment implications of embedded journalism // NYUL Rev. 2005. Vol. 80. P. 1309.Ziede E. J. In bed with the military: First Amendment implications of embedded journalism // NYUL Rev. 2005. Vol. 80. P. 1309.Dewey B. I. The embedded librarian: Strategic campus collaborations // Resource Sharing & Information Networks. 2004. Vol. 17. № 1–2. P. 5–17. doi: 10.1300/J121v17n01_02Dewey B. I. The embedded librarian: Strategic campus collaborations // Resource Sharing & Information Networks. 2004. Vol. 17. № 1–2. P. 5–17. doi: 10.1300/J121v17n01_02Shumaker D., Tyler L. Embedded Library Services: An Initial Inquiry into Practices for Their Development, Management, and Delivery. In: Shumaker D. et al. (eds.) Special Libraries Association Annual Conference, Denver, CO (2007).Shumaker D., Tyler L. Embedded Library Services: An Initial Inquiry into Practices for Their Development, Management, and Delivery. In: Shumaker D. et al. (eds.) Special Libraries Association Annual Conference, Denver, CO (2007).Shumaker D. The Embedded Librarian: Innovative Strategies for Taking Knowledge Where It's Needed // Medford: Information Today. 2012. XVII, 212 S.Shumaker D. The Embedded Librarian: Innovative Strategies for Taking Knowledge Where It's Needed // Medford: Information Today. 2012. XVII, 212 S.Shumaker D. et. al. Models of Embedded Librarianship Final Report (2009). URL: https://embeddedlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/models-of-embeddedlibrarianship_finalreportrev.pdf.Shumaker D. et. al. Models of Embedded Librarianship Final Report (2009). URL: https://embeddedlibrarian.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/models-of-embeddedlibrarianship_finalreportrev.pdf.Shumaker D., Talley M. Models of embedded librarianship: A research summary // Information Outlook. 2010. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 26–35.Shumaker D., Talley M. Models of embedded librarianship: A research summary // Information Outlook. 2010. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 26–35.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.