<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">gpntb</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Научные и технические библиотеки</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Scientific and Technical Libraries</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1027-3689</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-8601</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33186/1027-3689-2025-8-52-71</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">gpntb-1567</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>НАУКОМЕТРИЯ. БИБЛИОМЕТРИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SCIENTOMETRICS. BIBLIOMETRICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Трансформация осведомлённости учёных и специалистов об альтметрике</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Transforming awareness of researchers and professionals on altmetrics</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6491-0412</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ударцева</surname><given-names>О. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Udartseva</surname><given-names>O. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Ударцева Ольга Михайловна – канд. пед. наук, старший научный сотрудник</p><p>Новосибирск</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Olga M. Udartseva – Cand Sc. (Pedagogy), Senior Researcher</p><p>Novosibirsk</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">udartseva@spsl.nsc.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ГПНТБ СО РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>State Public Scientific and Technological Library, Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>08</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>52</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Ударцева О.М., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Ударцева О.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Udartseva O.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ntb.gpntb.ru/jour/article/view/1567">https://ntb.gpntb.ru/jour/article/view/1567</self-uri><abstract><p>Альтметрика сегодня не используется в полной мере для оценки научных результатов, несмотря на её потенциал. В статье обсуждаются результаты мониторинга осведомлённости учёных и специалистов об альтметрике, а также кратко излагается история формирования альтметрии и изменения отношения к альтметрике за рубежом и в России. Цель исследования – на основании сравнительного анализа данных опросов 2020 и 2025 гг. определить произошедшие в восприятии альтметрики изменения отечественными учёными и специалистами. Проведённый мониторинг выявил постепенное увеличение интереса к альтметрике среди российских пользователей за последние пять лет. Однако часть респондентов (49,0%) затрудняется дать определение термину, что свидетельствует о недостаточной информированности. Дана характеристика ключевым, по мнению респондентов, альтернативным показателям: загрузки/скачивания, рекомендации, просмотры. Отмечено, что показатель цитирования по отношению к альтметрическим показателям является наиболее значимым для респондентов. Названы наиболее популярные инструменты – Altmetric и Plum Analytics, которые активно используются за рубежом и начинают интегрироваться в российские информационные системы. Для просмотра альтметрических данных учёными и специалистами используются электронные библиотеки и открытые информационные ресурсы и сервисы (такие как Dimensions, Open Alex и др.).</p><p>Статья подготовлена по плану НИР ГПНТБ СО РАН, проект «Разработка модели функционирования научной библиотеки в информационной экосистеме открытой науки», № 122041100150-3.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The altmetrics are not utilized to the full extent despite their potential. The author discusses the findings of the survey of researchers’ and professionals’ awareness of altmetrics, and reviews in brief the history of altmetrics and changing attitude toward altmetrics in Russia and Worldwide. The purpose of the study is to define, based on the critical analysis of 2020 and 2025 surveys, the changes in the altmetrics perception among the Russian scientists. The survey revealed the gradual increase of the interest to altmetrics among Russian users in the national science in the past five years. However, a significant part of respondents (49.0%) is puzzled with the term definition which evidences on their unawareness. The key, in respondents’ opinion, alternative indicators are characterized, i. e. loads, recommendations, views. The author emphasizes that the respondents consider citation the most significant indicators as related to the altmetrics. She also discusses the most popular tools, e.g. Altmetric and Plum Analytics, used in the global practice and integrated into Russian information systems. To get altmetrics data, the researchers and professional access e-libraries and open information resources and services (e. g. Dimensions, Open Alex, etc.).</p><p>The study is completed within the framework of the R&amp;D Plan of the State Public Scientific and Technological Library of the RAS Siberian Branch, project “Development of the model of scientific library operation within the information ecosystem of open science”, No. 122041100150-3.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>альтметрика</kwd><kwd>опрос</kwd><kwd>мониторинг интереса к альтметрике</kwd><kwd>открытая научная оценка</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>altmetrics</kwd><kwd>survey</kwd><kwd>monitoring interest in altmetrics</kwd><kwd>open scholarly assessment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мазов Н. А., Гуреев В. Н. Альтернативные подходы к оценке научных результатов // Вестник Российской Академии наук. 2015. Т. 85, № 2. С. 115–122. DOI 10.7868/S0869587315020103. URL: http://www.ipgg.sbras.ru/ru/publications/ibc/2015/vran-2015-02-115.pdf (дата обращения: 27.02.2025).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mazov N. A., Gureev V. N. Al`ternativny`e podhody` k ocenke nauchny`kh rezul`tatov // Vestneyk Rossii`skoi` Akademii nauk. 2015. T. 85, № 2. S. 115–122. DOI 10.7868/S0869587315020103. URL: http://www.ipgg.sbras.ru/ru/publications/ibc/2015/vran-2015-02-115.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 27.02.2025).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ortega J. L. Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com, PlumX and Crossref Event Data // Scientometrics. 2018. Vol. 116, № 3. P. 2123–2138. DOI 10.1007/s11192-018-2838-z.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ortega J. L. Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com, PlumX and Crossref Event Data // Scientometrics. 2018. Vol. 116, № 3. P. 2123–2138. DOI 10.1007/s11192-018-2838-z.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shema H., Bar-Ilan J., &amp; Thelwall M. Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information // PLoS One. 2012. Vol. 7, № 5. e35869. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035869.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shema H., Bar-Ilan J., &amp; Thelwall M. Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information // PLoS One. 2012. Vol. 7, № 5. e35869. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035869.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ortega J. L. Blogs and news sources coverage in altmetrics data providers: a comparative analysis by country, language, and subject // Scientometrics. 2020. Vol. 122, № 1. P. 555–572. DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03299-2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ortega J. L. Blogs and news sources coverage in altmetrics data providers: a comparative analysis by country, language, and subject // Scientometrics. 2020. Vol. 122, № 1. P. 555–572. DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03299-2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mohammadi E., Thelwall M., &amp; Kousha K. Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 67, № 5. P. 1198–1209.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mohammadi E., Thelwall M., &amp; Kousha K. Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 67, № 5. P. 1198–1209.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thelwall M. Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields? // Scientometrics. 2017. Vol. 113, № 3. P. 1721–1731. DOI 10.1007/s11192-017-2557-x.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thelwall M. Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields? // Scientometrics. 2017. Vol. 113, № 3. P. 1721–1731. DOI 10.1007/s11192-017-2557-x.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fleerackers Alice et al. Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data // Scientometrics. 2022. Vol. 127. P. 6109–6123.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fleerackers Alice et al. Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data // Scientometrics. 2022. Vol. 127. P. 6109–6123.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Takano Y., Mejia C., &amp; Kajikawa Y. Unconnected component inclusion technique for patent network analysis: Case study of Internet of Things-related technologies // Journal of Informetrics. 2016. Vol. 10, № 4. P. 967–980. DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2016.05.004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Takano Y., Mejia C., &amp; Kajikawa Y. Unconnected component inclusion technique for patent network analysis: Case study of Internet of Things-related technologies // Journal of Informetrics. 2016. Vol. 10, № 4. P. 967–980. DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2016.05.004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Holmberg K., &amp; Thelwall M. Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication // Scientometrics. 2014. Vol. 101, № 2. P. 1027–1042. DOI 10.1007/s11192-014-1229-3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Holmberg K., &amp; Thelwall M. Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication // Scientometrics. 2014. Vol. 101, № 2. P. 1027–1042. DOI 10.1007/s11192-014-1229-3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thelwall M., Haustein S., Larivière V., &amp; Sugimoto C. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other candidates // PLOS ONE. 2013. Vol. 8, № 5. e64841. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thelwall M., Haustein S., Larivière V., &amp; Sugimoto C. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other candidates // PLOS ONE. 2013. Vol. 8, № 5. e64841. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ringelhan S., Wollersheim J., &amp; Welpe I. M. I like, I cite? Do Facebook likes predict the impact of scientific work? // PloS one. 2015. Vol. 10, № 8. e0134389. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0134389.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ringelhan S., Wollersheim J., &amp; Welpe I. M. I like, I cite? Do Facebook likes predict the impact of scientific work? // PloS one. 2015. Vol. 10, № 8. e0134389. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0134389.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arroyo-Machado W., Robinson-García N., &amp; Torres-Salinas D. Are there stars in Bluesky? A comparative exploratory analysis of altmetric mentions between X and Bluesky // ArXiv. 2024. abs/2412.05624.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arroyo-Machado W., Robinson-García N., &amp; Torres-Salinas D. Are there stars in Bluesky? A comparative exploratory analysis of altmetric mentions between X and Bluesky // ArXiv. 2024. abs/2412.05624.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xia F., Su X., Wang W., Zhang C., Ning Z., &amp; Lee I. Bibliographic analysis of Nature based on Twitter and Facebook altmetrics data // PloS one. 2016. Vol. 11, № 12. e0165997. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0165997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xia F., Su X., Wang W., Zhang C., Ning Z., &amp; Lee I. Bibliographic analysis of Nature based on Twitter and Facebook altmetrics data // PloS one. 2016. Vol. 11, № 12. e0165997. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0165997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гринев А. В. Насколько пригодна альтметрия для оценки научной деятельности специалиста? // Управление наукой и наукометрия. 2024. Т. 19, № 2. С. 424–451. DOI 10.33873/2686-6706.2024.19-2.424-451.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Greenev A. V. Naskol`ko prigodna al`tmetriia dlia ocenki nauchnoi` deiatel`nosti spetcialista? // Upravlenie naukoi` i naukometriia. 2024. T. 19, № 2. S. 424–451. DOI 10.33873/2686-6706.2024.19-2.424-451.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Koos J. The Potential of a Cost-Per-Use Analysis to Assess the Value of Library OpenAccess Funds // Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2018. Vol. 13, № 4. P. 99–101. DOI 10.18438/eblip29453.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koos J. The Potential of a Cost-Per-Use Analysis to Assess the Value of Library OpenAccess Funds // Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2018. Vol. 13, № 4. P. 99–101. DOI 10.18438/eblip29453.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гончаров М. В., Колосов К. А. Вопросы расчёта альтметрик на основе данных, формируемых при обращении пользователей к электронным каталогам библиотек // Научные и технические библиотеки. 2020. № 11. С. 73–88.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goncharov M. V., Kolosov K. A. Voprosy` raschyota al`tmetrik na osnove danny`kh, formiruemy`kh pri obrashchenii pol`zovatelei` k e`lektronny`m katalogam bibliotek // Nauchny`e i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2020. № 11. S. 73–88.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гончаров М. В., Колосов К. А. Использование статистических данных веб-серверов библиотек для вычисления альтметрик // Научные и технические библиотеки. 2019. № 12. С. 25–33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goncharov M. V., Kolosov K. A. Ispol`zovanie statisticheskikh danny`kh veb-serverov bibliotek dlia vy`chisleniia al`tmetrik // Nauchny`e i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2019. № 12. S. 25–33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чеснялис П. А. Альтметрики: осведомлённость и интерес // Научные и технические библиотеки. 2021. № 1. С. 27–40. DOI 10.33186/1027-3689-2021-1-27-40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chesnialis P. A. Al`tmetriki: osvedomlyonnost` i interes // Nauchny`e i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2021. № 1. S. 27–40. DOI 10.33186/1027-3689-2021-1-27-40.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reed K., McFarland D., &amp; Croft R. Laying the Groundwork for a New Library Service: Scholar-Practitioner &amp; Graduate Student Attitudes Toward Altmetrics and the Curation of Online Profiles // Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2016. Vol. 11, № 2. P. 87–96. DOI 10.18438/B8J047.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reed K., McFarland D., &amp; Croft R. Laying the Groundwork for a New Library Service: Scholar-Practitioner &amp; Graduate Student Attitudes Toward Altmetrics and the Curation of Online Profiles // Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2016. Vol. 11, № 2. P. 87–96. DOI 10.18438/B8J047.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Malone T., &amp; Burke S. Academic Librarians’ Knowledge of Bibliometrics and Altmetrics // Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2016. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 34–49. DOI 10.18438/B85G9J.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malone T., &amp; Burke S. Academic Librarians’ Knowledge of Bibliometrics and Altmetrics // Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2016. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 34–49. DOI 10.18438/B85G9J.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferrier-Watson A. Traditional metrics, altmetrics and researcher profiles: A survey of faculty perceptions and use. 2019. 66 p. URL: https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/2dca80ab-4190-46c6-91bacc4a3181ec60/content (дата обращения: 27.02.2025).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ferrier-Watson A. Traditional metrics, altmetrics and researcher profiles: A survey of faculty perceptions and use. 2019. 66 p. URL: https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/2dca80ab-4190-46c6-91bacc4a3181ec60/content (accessed: 27.02.2025).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Melicherová Michaela, Miriam Ondrišová and Jaroslav Susol. Bibliometrics versus altmetrics: Researchers’ attitudes in Slovakia // Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication. 2021. Vol. 1, № 1: n. pag. DOI 10.47909/ijsmc.11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Melicherová Michaela, Miriam Ondrišová and Jaroslav Susol. Bibliometrics versus altmetrics: Researchers’ attitudes in Slovakia // Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication. 2021. Vol. 1, № 1: n. pag. DOI 10.47909/ijsmc.11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Áine Regan and Maeve Henchion. Making Sense of Altmetrics: The Perceived Threats and Opportunities for Academic Identity // Science and Public Policy. 2019. Vol. 46, № 4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Áine Regan and Maeve Henchion. Making Sense of Altmetrics: The Perceived Threats and Opportunities for Academic Identity // Science and Public Policy. 2019. Vol. 46, № 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aung H. H., Erdt M., Theng Y. L. Awareness and usage of altmetrics: a user survey // Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2017. Vol. 54, № 1. P. 18–26. DOI 10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aung H. H., Erdt M., Theng Y. L. Awareness and usage of altmetrics: a user survey // Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2017. Vol. 54, № 1. P. 18–26. DOI 10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Haustein S., Bowman T. D., &amp; Costas R. Interpreting Altmetrics: Viewing Acts on Social Media through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories // Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication. 2016. P. 372–406. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7cad/8c2212afb03a0d3e61daa630357c9282c040.pdf (дата обращения: 27.02.2025).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Haustein S., Bowman T. D., &amp; Costas R. Interpreting Altmetrics: Viewing Acts on Social Media through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories // Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication. 2016. P. 372–406. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7cad/8c2212afb03a0d3e61daa630357c9282c040.pdf (accessed: 27.02.2025).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ortega J.-L. Altmetrics Data Providers: a Meta-Analysis Review of the Coverage of Metrics and Publications // El profesional de la información. 2020. Vol. 29, № 1. e290107. DOI 10.3145/epi.2020.ene.07.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ortega J.-L. Altmetrics Data Providers: a Meta-Analysis Review of the Coverage of Metrics and Publications // El profesional de la información. 2020. Vol. 29, № 1. e290107. DOI 10.3145/epi.2020.ene.07.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guerrero-Bote V. P., &amp; Moya-Anegón F. Relationship between downloads and citations at journal and paper levels, and the influence of language // Scientometrics. 2014. Vol. 101, № 2. P. 1043–1065.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guerrero-Bote V. P., &amp; Moya-Anegón F. Relationship between downloads and citations at journal and paper levels, and the influence of language // Scientometrics. 2014. Vol. 101, № 2. P. 1043–1065.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gorraiz J., Gumpenberger C., Schlögl C. Usage versus citation behaviours in four subject areas // Scientometrics. 2014. Vol. 101. P. 1077–1095.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gorraiz J., Gumpenberger C., Schlögl C. Usage versus citation behaviours in four subject areas // Scientometrics. 2014. Vol. 101. P. 1077–1095.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Waltman L., &amp; Costas R. F1000 Recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: A comparison with citations // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014. Vol. 65, № 3. P. 433–445.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Waltman L., &amp; Costas R. F1000 Recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: A comparison with citations // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014. Vol. 65, № 3. P. 433–445.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ударцева О. М. Альтметрические данные на сайтах журналов открытого доступа // Социология науки и технологий. 2025. Т. 16, № 1. С. 193–207. DOI 10.24412/2079-0910-2025-1-193-207.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Udartceva O. M. Al`tmetricheskie danny`e na sai`takh zhurnalov otkry`togo dostupa // Sotciologiia nauki i tekhnologii`. 2025. T. 16, № 1. S. 193–207. DOI 10.24412/2079-0910-2025-1-193-207.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
