gpntbНаучные и технические библиотекиScientific and Technical Libraries1027-36892686-8601Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology10.33186/1027-3689-2019-12-5-24gpntb-507Research ArticleНАУКОМЕТРИЯ. БИБЛИОМЕТРИЯSCIENTOMETRICS. BIBLIOMETRICSКритерии авторства и проблема его атрибуции в научных публикацияхAuthorship criteria and the problem of its attribution in scholarly papersГуреевВ. Н.GureevV. N.

Гуреев Вадим Николаевич, кандидат педагогических наук, старший научный сотрудник информационно-аналитического центра Института нефтегазовой геологии и геофизики им. А. А. Трофимука СО РАН; старший научный сотрудник ГПНТБ СО РАН

Новосибирск

Vadim Gureev, Cand. Sc. (Pedagogy), Senior Researcher, Information and Library Center, A. A. Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch; Senior Researcher, State Public Scientific and Technological Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch

3, acad. Koptyg pr., 630200 Novosibirsk

GureyevVN@ipgg.sbras.ruМазовН. А.MazovN. A.

Мазов Николай Алексеевич, кандидат технических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, заведующий информационно-аналитическим центром Института нефтегазовой геологии и геофизики им. А. А. Трофимука СО РАН; ведущий научный сотрудник ГПНТБ СО РАН 

Новосибирск

Nikolay Mazov, Cand. Sc. (Technology), Leading Researcher, Head, Information and Library Center, A. A. Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Gepphysics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch; Leading Researcher, State Public Scientific and Technological Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch

3, acad. Koptyg pr., 630200 Novosibirsk

MazovNA@ipgg.sbras.ruЛакизоИ. Г.LakizoI. G.

Лакизо Ирина Геласиевна, научный сотрудник 

Новосибирск

Irina Lakizo, Researcher, State Public Scientific and Technological Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch

15, Voskhod st., 630200 Novosibirsk

lakizo@spsl.nsc.ruИнститут нефтегазовой геологии и геофизики им. А. А. Трофимука СО РАН; ГПНТБ СО РАНРоссияA. A. Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, SB RAS; State Public Scientific and Technological Library, SB RASRussian FederationИнститут нефтегазовой геологии и геофизики им. А. А. Трофимука СО РАН; ГПНТБ СО РАНРоссияA. A. Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, SB RAS; State Public Scientific and Technological Library, SB RASRussian FederationГПНТБ СО РАНРоссияState Public Scientific and Technological Library, SB RASRussian Federation201911122019012524Copyright © Гуреев В.Н., Мазов Н.А., Лакизо И.Г., 20192019Гуреев В.Н., Мазов Н.А., Лакизо И.Г.Gureev V.N., Mazov N.A., Lakizo I.G.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ntb.gpntb.ru/jour/article/view/507

Усложнение научных исследований, появление новых областей на стыках различных дисциплин, расширение международного сотрудничества способствуют росту числа авторов в расчёте на научную публикацию, а также увеличению числа соавторов. Это ведёт к проблеме атрибуции авторства, требующей разработки новых подходов к выявлению авторских ролей и формированию новых критериев авторства. Решение проблемы атрибуции авторства призвано установить действительный вклад учёного в подготовку исследования и статьи по его результатам, разграничить зоны ответственности соавторов, позволить отдельным учёным накапливать собственный репутационный капитал. В статье представлен обзор отечественных и зарубежных подходов к решению обозначенной проблемы, включая формирование новых разделов публикаций для указания лиц, не соответствующих критериям авторства, и разработку моделей упорядочения имён авторов. Прослежены основные этапы формирования критериев авторства, отражены преимущества и недостатки модели авторства посредством противопоставления новой модели описания видов участия в научном исследовании. Перспективным представляется переход к фракционному учёту вклада каждого из создателей научного произведения, при котором возрастает значение позиции авторов в авторской строке и усиливается роль разделов публикации с конкретным описанием авторского вклада.

A complication of academic research, the emergence of new subject areas at the intersection of different scientific disciplines, increase in international collaboration are accompanied by an increase in the number of co-authors resulting in the problem of author attribution requiring the development of new approaches to detecting authors’ roles and formation of new authorship criteria. The solution of the problem of authorship attribution should specify actual contribution of the scientist to preparing research and the paper, distinguish areas of responsibility of co-authors, and enable certain researchers to accumulate their own reputation capital. The current study presents a review of Russian and foreign approaches for solving this problem including the development of new sections in articles for naming persons who do not match authorship criteria and introduction of models of sequence order of authors. The paper also traces the main stages in the development of authorship criteria, describes the advantages and disadvantages of authorship model as compared to new contributorship model. Transition to the fractional calculation of the contribution of each participant of a research paper is believed to be promising implying significance of the author’s position in the byline and an increased role of paper sections describing the specific contribution of each author.

авторствосоавторствоавторский вкладкритерии авторстваатрибуция авторстванедобросовестное авторствоauthorshipco-authorshipauthor’s contributionauthorship criteriaauthorship attributionunethical authorshipИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта 19-011-00534.ReferencesOlesen A., Amin L., Mahadi Z. Unethical authorship practices: A qualitative study in Malaysian higher education institutions // Developing World Bioethics. – 2018. – V. 18. – № 3. – P. 271–278. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12200.Olesen A., Amin L., Mahadi Z. Unethical authorship practices: A qualitative study in Malaysian higher education institutions // Developing World Bioethics. – 2018. – V. 18. – № 3. – P. 271–278. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12200.Dang W., McInnes M. D. F., Kielar A. Z., Hong J.H. A Comprehensive Analysis of Authorship in Radiology Journals // Plos One. – 2015. – V. 10. – № 9. – P. 15. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139005.Dang W., McInnes M. D. F., Kielar A. Z., Hong J.H. A Comprehensive Analysis of Authorship in Radiology Journals // Plos One. – 2015. – V. 10. – № 9. – P. 15. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139005.Мазов Н. А., Гуреев В. Н. Публикации любой ценой? // Вестн. Рос. акад. наук. – 2015. – Т. 85. – № 7. – С. 627–631. – Режим доступа: https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869587315050072.Mazov N. A., Gureyev V. N. Publications at any costs // Vestn. Ros. Akad. Nauk. – 2015. – V. 85. – № 7. – P. 627–631. – URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.7868/S0869587315050072.Chew F. S. Coauthorship in radiology journals // American Journal of Roentgenology. – 1987. – V. 150. – № 1. – P. 23–26.Chew F. S. Coauthorship in radiology journals // American Journal of Roentgenology. – 1987. – V. 150. – № 1. – P. 23–26.Моисеенко В. В., Родионов А. С. Возрастная зависимость соавторства при проведении научных исследований в академическом институте // Проблемы информатики. – 2017. – № 1 (34). – C. 62–73.Moiseenko V. V., Rodionov A. S. Age dependance of co-authorship when carrying out scientific studies in academic organization // Problems of Informatics. – 2017. – № 1 (34). – P. 62–73.Gasparyan A. Y., Ayvazyan L., Kitas G. D. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors // Rheumatology International. – 2013. – V. 33. – № 2. – P. 277–284. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2582-2.Gasparyan A. Y., Ayvazyan L., Kitas G. D. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors // Rheumatology International. – 2013. – V. 33. – № 2. – P. 277–284. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2582-2.Goudsmit S. A. Editorial // Physical Review Letters. – 1962. – V. 8. – № 6. – P. 229–230. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.8.229.Goudsmit S. A. Editorial // Physical Review Letters. – 1962. – V. 8. – № 6. – P. 229–230. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.8.229.Davenport E., Cronin B. Who dunnit? Metatags and hyperauthorship // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. – 2001. – V. 52. – № 9. – P. 770–773. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1123.Davenport E., Cronin B. Who dunnit? Metatags and hyperauthorship // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. – 2001. – V. 52. – № 9. – P. 770–773. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1123.Wagner-Dobler R. Continuity and discontinuity of collaboration behaviour since 1800 – from a bibliometric point of view // Scientometrics. – 2001. – V. 52. – № 3. – P. 503–517. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014208219788.Wagner-Dobler R. Continuity and discontinuity of collaboration behaviour since 1800 – from a bibliometric point of view // Scientometrics. – 2001. – V. 52. – № 3. – P. 503–517. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014208219788.Sampson Z. J. 40-years of the physical-review and physical-review letters // Scientometrics. – 1995. – V. 32. – № 2. – P. 219–226. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016895.Sampson Z. J. 40-years of the physical-review and physical-review letters // Scientometrics. – 1995. – V. 32. – № 2. – P. 219–226. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016895.Zuckerman H. A. Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity // American Journal of Sociology. – 1968. – V. 74. – № 3. – P. 276–291. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/224641.Zuckerman H. A. Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity // American Journal of Sociology. – 1968. – V. 74. – № 3. – P. 276–291. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/224641.Piternick A. B. Traditional Interpretations of "Authorship" and "Responsibility" in the Description of Scientific and Technical Documents // Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. – 1985. – V. 5. – № 3. – P. 17–33. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v05n03_02.Piternick A. B. Traditional Interpretations of "Authorship" and "Responsibility" in the Description of Scientific and Technical Documents // Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. – 1985. – V. 5. – № 3. – P. 17–33. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v05n03_02.Гуреев В. Н., Лакизо И. Г., Мазов Н. А. Проблема недобросовестного авторства в научных публикациях и подходы к её решению // Материалы Пятого междунар. профес. форума «Книга. Культура. Образование. Инновации» («Крым–2019») (8–16 июня 2019 г., Судак). – Москва : Изд-во ГПНТБ России, 2019. – С. 1–6.Gureyev V. N., Lakizo I. G., Mazov N. A. Unfair authorship in science publications and approaches to eliminate it // Proceedings of the Fifth World Professional Forum “The book. Culture. Education. Innovations” (“Crimea-2019”) (8–16 June 2019, Sudak, Crimea). – Moscow : NPLS&T Russia, 2019. – P. 1–6.Guidelines on authorship. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors // British Medical Journal. – 1985. – V. 291. – № 6497. – P. 722. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.291.6497.722.Guidelines on authorship. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors // British Medical Journal. – 1985. – V. 291. – № 6497. – P. 722. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.291.6497.722.On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research: Third edition. – Washington : National Academies Press, 2009. – 82 p.On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research: Third edition. – Washington : National Academies Press, 2009. – 82 p.Academy of management code of ethics // Academy of Management Journal. – 2011. – V. 54. – № 6. – P. 1299–1306.Academy of management code of ethics // Academy of Management Journal. – 2011. – V. 54. – № 6. – P. 1299–1306.On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research: Second edition. – Washington : National Academies Press, 1995. – 49 p.On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research: Second edition. – Washington : National Academies Press, 1995. – 49 p.Михайлов О. В. Рассуждения о соавторах и соавторстве // Вестн. Рос. акад. наук. – 2014. – Т. 84. – № 1. – C. 93–96. – Режим доступа: https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869587314010071.Mikhailov O. V. Discussion on co-authors and co-authorship // Vestn. Ros. acad. nauk. – 2014. – V. 84. – № 1. – P. 93–96. – URL: https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869587314010071.Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. – ICMJE, 2018. – 19 p.Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. – ICMJE, 2018. – 19 p.Clement T. P. Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contribu¬tions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles // Science and Engineering Ethics. – 2014. – V. 20. – № 2. – P. 345–361. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3.Clement T. P. Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contribu¬tions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles // Science and Engineering Ethics. – 2014. – V. 20. – № 2. – P. 345–361. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3.Полников В. Г. О соавторстве в науке // Путь науки. – 2015. – № 10 (20). – C. 149–151.Polnikov V. G. On co-authorship in the science // The way of science. – 2015. – № 10 (20). – C. 149–151.Бугаев К. В. Некоторые проблемы этики соавторства // Вестн. Сиб. ин-та бизнеса и информ. технологий. – 2012. – Т. 2. – № 2. – С. 72–73.Bugaev K. V. Some problems of co-authorship ethics // Herald of Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technologies. – 2012. – V. 2. – № 2. – P. 72–73.Marušic A., Hren D., Mansi B., Lineberry N., Bhattacharya A., Garrity M., Clark J., Gesell T., Glasser S., Gonzalez J., Hustad C., Lannon M. M., Mooney L. A., Peña T. Five-step authorship framework to improve transparency in disclosing contributors to industry-sponsored clinical trial publications // BMC Medicine. – 2014. – V. 12. – № 1. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0197-z.Marušic A., Hren D., Mansi B., Lineberry N., Bhattacharya A., Garrity M., Clark J., Gesell T., Glasser S., Gonzalez J., Hustad C., Lannon M. M., Mooney L. A., Peña T. Five-step authorship framework to improve transparency in disclosing contributors to industry-sponsored clinical trial publications // BMC Medicine. – 2014. – V. 12. – № 1. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0197-z.COPE. How to spot authorship problems. – 2019. – URL: https://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/Authorship%20problems.pdf (дата обращения: 06.2019).COPE. How to spot authorship problems. – 2019. – URL: https://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/Authorship%20problems.pdf (дата обращения: 06.2019).COPE. What to do if you suspect ghost, guest or gift authorship. – 2019. – URL: https://publicationethics.org/files/Ghost.pdf (дата обращения: 06.2019).COPE. What to do if you suspect ghost, guest or gift authorship. – 2019. – URL: https://publicationethics.org/files/Ghost.pdf (дата обращения: 06.2019).CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update / Scott-Lichter D. – 3rd Revised Edition. – Wheat Ridge, CO : Council of Science Editors, 2012. – 90 p.CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update / Scott-Lichter D. – 3rd Revised Edition. – Wheat Ridge, CO : Council of Science Editors, 2012. – 90 p.Ассоциация научных редакторов и издателей. – 2019. – Режим доступа: https://rasep.ru/ (дата обращения: 06.2019).Association of Science Editors and Publishers. – 2019. – URL: https://rasep.ru/.Белая книга Совета научных редакторов о соблюдении принципов целостности публикаций в научных журналах. Обновленная версия 2012 г. / Комитет по редакционной политике (2011–2012) ; пер. с англ. канд. пед. наук В. Н. Гуреева под ред. канд. техн. наук Н. А. Мазова. – Екатеринбург : Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2016. – 132 с.CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update / Scott-Lichter D. – 3rd Revised Edition. – Wheat Ridge, CO : Council of Science Editors, 2012. – 90 p.Gaeta T. J. Authorship: "law" and order // Academic Emergency Medicine. – 1999. – V. 6. – № 4. – P. 297–301. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00393.x.Gaeta T. J. Authorship: "law" and order // Academic Emergency Medicine. – 1999. – V. 6. – № 4. – P. 297–301. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00393.x.Case K., Davidson F., Smith R., Squires B. P., Lundberg G., Glass R., Horton R., van der Weyden M., Utiger R., Robinson R. G., Nylenna M., Colaianni L. A., Clever L. H., Woolf P. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals // Journal of the American Medical Association. – 1997. – V. 277. – № 11. – P. 927–934.Case K., Davidson F., Smith R., Squires B. P., Lundberg G., Glass R., Horton R., van der Weyden M., Utiger R., Robinson R. G., Nylenna M., Colaianni L. A., Clever L. H., Woolf P. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals // Journal of the American Medical Association. – 1997. – V. 277. – № 11. – P. 927–934.Bošnjak L., Marušić A. Prescribed practices of authorship: Review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines // Scientometrics. – 2012. – V. 93. – № 3. – P. 751–763. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0773-y.Bošnjak L., Marušić A. Prescribed practices of authorship: Review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines // Scientometrics. – 2012. – V. 93. – № 3. – P. 751–763. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0773-y.Wager E. Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? // Medscape general medicine. – 2007. – V. 3. – 16 p.Wager E. Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? // Medscape general medicine. – 2007. – V. 3. – 16 p.Uijtdehaage S., Mavis B., Durning S.J. Whose Paper Is It Anyway? Authorship Criteria According to Established Scholars in Health Professions Education // Academic Medicine. – 2018. – V. 93. – № 8. – P. 1171–1175. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002144.Uijtdehaage S., Mavis B., Durning S.J. Whose Paper Is It Anyway? Authorship Criteria According to Established Scholars in Health Professions Education // Academic Medicine. – 2018. – V. 93. – № 8. – P. 1171–1175. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002144.Brand R. A. Editorial: Further thoughts on authorship: Gift authorship // Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. – 2012. – V. 470. – № 10. – P. 2926–2929. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2504-3.Brand R. A. Editorial: Further thoughts on authorship: Gift authorship // Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. – 2012. – V. 470. – № 10. – P. 2926–2929. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2504-3.Anstey A. Authorship issues: Grizzles, guests and ghosts // British Journal of Dermatology. – 2014. – V. 170. – № 6. – P. 1209–1210. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13095.Anstey A. Authorship issues: Grizzles, guests and ghosts // British Journal of Dermatology. – 2014. – V. 170. – № 6. – P. 1209–1210. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13095.Baskin P. K., Gross R. A. Honorary and ghost authorship // BMJ (Online). – 2011. – V. 343. – № 7835. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6223.Baskin P. K., Gross R. A. Honorary and ghost authorship // BMJ (Online). – 2011. – V. 343. – № 7835. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6223.Kassirer J. P. Authorship criteria // Science. – 1995. – V. 268. – № 5212. – P. 785–786.Kassirer J. P. Authorship criteria // Science. – 1995. – V. 268. – № 5212. – P. 785–786.Liesegang T. J., Bartley G. B. Footnotes, acknowledgments, and authorship: Toward greater responsibility, accountability, and transparency // American Journal of Ophthalmology. – 2014. – V. 158. – № 6. – P. 1103–1104. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.09.013.Liesegang T. J., Bartley G. B. Footnotes, acknowledgments, and authorship: Toward greater responsibility, accountability, and transparency // American Journal of Ophthalmology. – 2014. – V. 158. – № 6. – P. 1103–1104. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.09.013.Greenland P., Fontanarosa P. B. Ending honorary authorship // Science. – 2012. – V. 337. – № 6098. – P. 1019. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224988.Greenland P., Fontanarosa P. B. Ending honorary authorship // Science. – 2012. – V. 337. – № 6098. – P. 1019. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224988.Marco C. A., Schmidt T. A. Who Wrote This Paper? Basics of Authorship and Ethical Issues // Academic Emergency Medicine. – 2004. – V. 11. – № 1. – P. 76–77. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.08.015.Marco C. A., Schmidt T. A. Who Wrote This Paper? Basics of Authorship and Ethical Issues // Academic Emergency Medicine. – 2004. – V. 11. – № 1. – P. 76–77. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.08.015.Coats A. J. S., Shewan L. G. Statement on authorship and publishing ethics in the international journal of cardiology // International Journal of Cardiology. – 2011. – V. 153. – № 3. – P. 239–240. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.119.Coats A. J. S., Shewan L. G. Statement on authorship and publishing ethics in the international journal of cardiology // International Journal of Cardiology. – 2011. – V. 153. – № 3. – P. 239–240. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.119.Dance A. Authorship: Who's on first? // Nature. – 2012. – V. 489. – № 7417. – P. 591–593. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7417-591a.Dance A. Authorship: Who's on first? // Nature. – 2012. – V. 489. – № 7417. – P. 591–593. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7417-591a.Сергеев Н. М. Этика цитирования и этика авторства // Тез. докл. XIV Междунар. конф. «Спектроскопия координационных соединений» (Туапсе, 24–30 сент. 2017 г.). – Краснодар : Кубан. гос. ун-т, 2017. – С. 35.Sergeev N. M. Citation ethics and authorship ethics // Proceedings of XIV International conference “Spectroscopy of coordination compounds” (Tuapse, 24–30 September 2017). – Krasnodar : Kuban State University, 2017. – P. 35.Мчедлов-Петросян Н. О. Этический аспект научных публикаций в условиях информационного взрыва (опыт химика) // Вісник Національної академії наук України. – 2014. – № 8. – C. 77–87.Mchedlov-Petrosyan N. O. Ethical aspact of scientific papers in the conditions of information explosion (chemist’s experience) // Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. – 2014. – № 8. – P. 77–87.Трошин В. Д. К этике научных публикаций // Мед. альм. – 2008. – № 2. – С. 19–23.Troshin V. D. About the ethics of scientific publications // Medical Almanac. – 2008. – № 2. ‒ P. 19–23.Riesenberg D., Lundberg G. D. The Order of Authorship: Who’s on First? // JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. – 1990. – V. 264. – № 14. – P. 1857. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03450140079039.Riesenberg D., Lundberg G. D. The Order of Authorship: Who’s on First? // JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. – 1990. – V. 264. – № 14. – P. 1857. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03450140079039.Ayiomamitis A. Multiple authorship: a mathematical sanctuary // CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l"Association medicale canadienne. – 1987. – V. 137. – № 12. – P. 1077–1078.Ayiomamitis A. Multiple authorship: a mathematical sanctuary // CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l"Association medicale canadienne. – 1987. – V. 137. – № 12. – P. 1077–1078.Garfield E. More on the ethics of scientific publication – abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia undermine the reward system of science // Current Contents. – 1982. – № 30. – P. 5–10.Garfield E. More on the ethics of scientific publication – abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia undermine the reward system of science // Current Contents. – 1982. – № 30. – P. 5–10.Marušić A., Bošnjak L., Jerončić A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines // PLoS ONE. – 2011. – V. 6. – № 9. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.Marušić A., Bošnjak L., Jerončić A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines // PLoS ONE. – 2011. – V. 6. – № 9. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.ГОСТ 7.1-2003. Библиографическая запись. Библиографическое описание. – Москва : ИПК Изд-во стандартов, 2004. – 166 c.GOST 7.1-2003. Bibliographic record. Bibliographic entry. – Moscow, 2004. – 166 p.Богатов В. В. Этика в научной деятельности // Вестн. Дальневост. отд-ния Рос. акад. наук. – 2008. – № 1 (137). – C. 144–157.Bogatov V. V. Ehics in scientific work // Herald of Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – 2008. – № 1 (137). – P. 144–157.Lange L. L. Citation counts of multi-authored papers – First-named authors and further authors // Scientometrics. – 2001. – V. 52. – № 3. – P. 457–470. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014299917063.Lange L. L. Citation counts of multi-authored papers – First-named authors and further authors // Scientometrics. – 2001. – V. 52. – № 3. – P. 457–470. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014299917063.Costas R., Bordons M. Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective // Scientometrics. – 2011. – V. 88. – № 1. – P. 145–161. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0368-z.Costas R., Bordons M. Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective // Scientometrics. – 2011. – V. 88. – № 1. – P. 145–161. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0368-z.Street J. M., Rogers W. A., Israel M., Braunack-Mayer A. J. Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences // Social Science and Medicine. – 2010. – V. 70. – № 9. – P. 1458–1465.Street J. M., Rogers W. A., Israel M., Braunack-Mayer A. J. Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences // Social Science and Medicine. – 2010. – V. 70. – № 9. – P. 1458–1465.Bennett D. M., Taylor D. M. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers // Emergency Medicine. – 2003. – V. 15. – № 3. – P. 263–270. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x.Bennett D. M., Taylor D. M. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers // Emergency Medicine. – 2003. – V. 15. – № 3. – P. 263–270. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x.Yank V., Rennie D. Disclosure of researcher contributions: A study of original research articles in the lancet // Annals of Internal Medicine. – 1999. – V. 130. – № 8. – P. 661–670. – URL: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-130-8-199904200-00013.Yank V., Rennie D. Disclosure of researcher contributions: A study of original research articles in the lancet // Annals of Internal Medicine. – 1999. – V. 130. – № 8. – P. 661–670. – URL: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-130-8-199904200-00013.Larivière V., Desrochers N., Macaluso B., Mongeon P., Paul-Hus A., Sugimoto C. R. Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production // Social Studies of Science. – 2016. – V. 46. – № 3. – P. 417–435. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046.Larivière V., Desrochers N., Macaluso B., Mongeon P., Paul-Hus A., Sugimoto C. R. Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production // Social Studies of Science. – 2016. – V. 46. – № 3. – P. 417–435. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046.Slone R. M. Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved coauthorship // American Journal of Roentgenology. – 1996. – V. 167. – № 3. – P. 571–579. – URL: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.3.8751654.Slone R. M. Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved coauthorship // American Journal of Roentgenology. – 1996. – V. 167. – № 3. – P. 571–579. – URL: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.3.8751654.Matheson A. How industry uses the ICMJE guidelines to manipulate authorship-and how they should be revised // PLoS Medicine. – 2011. – V. 8. – № 8. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001072.Matheson A. How industry uses the ICMJE guidelines to manipulate authorship-and how they should be revised // PLoS Medicine. – 2011. – V. 8. – № 8. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001072.Smith E., Hunt M., Master Z. Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries // BMC Medical Ethics. – 2014. – V. 15. – № 1. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-42.Smith E., Hunt M., Master Z. Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries // BMC Medical Ethics. – 2014. – V. 15. – № 1. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-42.Price J. H., Dake J. A., Oden L. Authorship of health education articles: Guests, ghosts, and trends // American Journal of Health Behavior. – 2000. – V. 24. – № 4. – P. 290–299. – URL: https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.24.4.5.Price J. H., Dake J. A., Oden L. Authorship of health education articles: Guests, ghosts, and trends // American Journal of Health Behavior. – 2000. – V. 24. – № 4. – P. 290–299. – URL: https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.24.4.5.Da Silva J. A. T. The ethics of collaborative authorship. More realistic standards and better accountability are needed to enhance scientific publication and give credit where it is due // EMBO Reports. – 2011. – V. 12. – № 9. – P. 889–893. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2011.161.Da Silva J. A. T. The ethics of collaborative authorship. More realistic standards and better accountability are needed to enhance scientific publication and give credit where it is due // EMBO Reports. – 2011. – V. 12. – № 9. – P. 889–893. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2011.161.Smith E., Williams-Jones B. Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies // Science and Engineering Ethics. – 2012. – V. 18. – № 2. – P. 199–212. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5.Smith E., Williams-Jones B. Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies // Science and Engineering Ethics. – 2012. – V. 18. – № 2. – P. 199–212. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5.Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. – 2018. – URL: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html (дата обращения: 20.06.2019).Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. – 2018. – URL: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html (дата обращения: 20.06.2019).Amy B., Liz A., Altman M., Marjorie H., Jo S. Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit // Learned Publishing. – 2015. – V. 28. – № 2.Amy B., Liz A., Altman M., Marjorie H., Jo S. Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit // Learned Publishing. – 2015. – V. 28. – № 2.Allen L., Brand A., Scott J., Altman M., Hlava M. Credit where credit is due // Nature. – 2014. – V. 508. – № 7496. – P. 312–313. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/508312a.Allen L., Brand A., Scott J., Altman M., Hlava M. Credit where credit is due // Nature. – 2014. – V. 508. – № 7496. – P. 312–313. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/508312a.Rennie D., Yank V., Emanuel L. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable // Jama. – 1997. – V. 278. – № 7. – P. 579–585. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041.Rennie D., Yank V., Emanuel L. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable // Jama. – 1997. – V. 278. – № 7. – P. 579–585. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041.Smith R. Authorship is dying: Long live contributorship. The BMJ will publish lists of contributors and guarantors to original articles // British Medical Journal. – 1997. – V. 315. – № 7110. – P. 696.Smith R. Authorship is dying: Long live contributorship. The BMJ will publish lists of contributors and guarantors to original articles // British Medical Journal. – 1997. – V. 315. – № 7110. – P. 696.Jones A. H. Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? // Science and Engineering Ethics. – 2003. – V. 9. – № 2. – P. 243–256. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0011-3.Jones A. H. Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? // Science and Engineering Ethics. – 2003. – V. 9. – № 2. – P. 243–256. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0011-3.Moffatt B. Responsible authorship: Why researchers must forgo honorary authorship // Accountability in Research. – 2011. – V. 18. – № 2. – P. 76–90. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.557297.Moffatt B. Responsible authorship: Why researchers must forgo honorary authorship // Accountability in Research. – 2011. – V. 18. – № 2. – P. 76–90. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.557297.Rohlfing T., Poline J. B. Why shared data should not be acknowledged on the author byline // NeuroImage. – 2012. – V. 59. – № 4. – P. 4189–4195. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.080.Rohlfing T., Poline J. B. Why shared data should not be acknowledged on the author byline // NeuroImage. – 2012. – V. 59. – № 4. – P. 4189–4195. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.080.Smith R. Let's simply scrap authorship and move to contributorship // BMJ (Online). – 2012. – V. 344. – № 7839. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e157.Smith R. Let's simply scrap authorship and move to contributorship // BMJ (Online). – 2012. – V. 344. – № 7839. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e157.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.