Studying information needs of central scientific library users in a big industrial city to improve the library document resources

Scientific libraries as an essential part of science, education, sociocultural and industrial complex of a region (big academic or industrial city) are engaged in developing information and communication environment. Therefore, systematic developing of library and information space is vital. Within the framework of the project “Regional scientific libraries in the changing science and education environment” (Fundamental Studies Program of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2022–2026), the State Public Scientific and Technical Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch has been designing the model to adapt regional libraries to modern communications and new methods of scientific publications dissemination within the context of social transformations and changing paradigm of library acquisition of scientific literature and information resources, the services provided to specialists in science and education and meeting their information needs, modified user preferences, behavior and reading styles, and the concept of libraries interaction in building and using their document resources. The authors focus on the science and education space and library and information infrastructure of Novosibirsk (big science and education center) and Western Siberia (Tomsk, Kemerovo Regions and Altay Kray) and, for comparison purposes, that of Chelyabinsk, the large industrial center in the Urals.

The authors characterize in brief Chelyabinsk industrial, science and academic specialization and its library system (based on the monitoring findings), as well as the primary results of the study of library users information needs (survey based); they also examine the compliance of document resources of Chelyabinsk Regional Universal Scientific Library to the user information needs to update the conceptual model of library and information services offered to students and specialists.

1. Zlochevskii` S. E. Informatcionny`e potrebnosti spetcialistov. Moskva, 1974. 35 s.

2. Kogotkov S. D. Formirovanie informatcionny`kh potrebnostei` // Nauchno-tekhnicheskaia informatciia. Ser. 2. 1986. № 2. S. 1–7.

3. Kogotkov D. Ia. Informatcionny`e potrebnosti i osnovny`e gruppy` potrebitelei` bibliograficheskoi` informatcii : lektciia / Moskovskii` gosudarstvenny`i` universitet kul`tury` i iskusstv. Moskva, 2000. 46 s.

4. Bliumenau D. I. K utochneniiu ishodny`kh poniatii` teorii informatcionny`kh potrebnostei` // Nauchno-tekhnicheskaia informatciia. Ser. 2. 1986. № 2. S. 7–12.

5. Giliarevskii` R. S., Marcusova V. A., Chyorny`i` A. I. Nauchny`e kommunikatcii i problemy` informatcionnoi` potrebnosti // Nauchno-tekhnicheskaia informatciia. Ser. 1. 1993. № 9. S. 1–7.

6. Sokolov A. V. Chto est` informatcionnaia potrebnost`? // Trudy` Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul`tury` i iskusstv. 2013. T. 197. S. 7–18.

7. Berestova T. F. Informatcionny`e potrebnosti : uchebnoe posobie / Cheliabinskii` gosudarstvenny`i` institut iskusstva i kul`tury`. Cheliabinsk, 2000. 111 s.

8. Evtiuhina E. A. Diagnostirovanie informatcionny`kh potrebnostei` // Bibliografiia. 2006. № 2. S. 26–29.

9. Brezhneva V. V., Giliarevskii` R. S. Informatcionnoe obsluzhivanie: izuchenie potrebitelei` informatcii, informatcionny`e produkty` i uslugi, organizatciia informatcionnogo obsluzhivaniia : uchebnoe posobie / Sankt-Peterburgskii` gosudarstvenny`i` universitet kul`tury` i iskusstv. Sankt-Peterburg : Professiia, 2012. 365 s.

10. Zagidullina M. V. Informatcionnaia potrebnost` kak teoreticheskaia problema // Vestneyk Volzhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatishcheva. 2012. № 3. S. 194–200.

11. Sal`nikov I. I. Osnovny`e e`tapy` razvitiia informatcionny`kh potrebnostei` cheloveka // Sovremenny`e naukoyomkie tekhnologii. 2010. № 10. S. 186–188.

12. Mrochko L. V., Pirogov A. I. Informatcionny`e potrebnosti i interesy` lichnosti: sviaz` i sopodchinenie obshchego i chastnogo // E`konomicheskie i sotcial`no-gumanitarny`e issledovaniia. 2016. № 3. S. 125–129.

13. GOST R 7.0.103–2018. Bibliotechno-informatcionnoe obsluzhivanie. Terminy` i opredeleniia: natcional`ny`i` standart Rossii`skoi` Federatcii: data vved. 01.07.2019. Moskva : Standartinform, 2018. IV, 13 c.

14. Lavrik O. L., Kaliuzhnaia T. A., Pleshakova M. A. Analiz informatcionny`kh potrebnostei` spetcialistov i uchyony`kh SO RAN // Nauchno-tekhnicheskaia informatciia. Ser. 1. 2018. № 1. S. 15–25.

15. Pleshakova M. A., Kaliuzhnaia T. A. Obzor metodov izucheniia informatcionny`kh potrebnostei` uchyony`kh i spetcialistov // Bibliosfera. 2017. № 3. S. 101–111.

16. Lavrik O. L., Kaliuzhnaia T. A. Soderzhanie poniatii` «informatcionnoe obespechenie», «informatcionnoe soprovozhdenie», «podderzhka nauchny`kh issledovanii`» kak e`tapy` informatcionnogo obsluzhivaniia uchyony`kh // Vestneyk Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul`turologiia i iskusstvovedenie. 2020. № 40. S. 305– 319. doi: 10.17223/22220836/40/28

17. Iudina I. G., Bazy`leva E. A., Vakhrameeva Z. V., Fedotova O. A. Informatcionny`e potrebnosti uchyony`kh i problemy` poiska informatcii (po materialam anketirovaniia sotrudnikov Novosibirskogo nauchnogo centra SO RAN) // Nauchny`e i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2018. № 11. S. 52–64. doi: 10.33186/1027-3689-2018-11-52-64

18. Kochukova E. V. Informatcionny`e potrebnosti uchyony`kh i informatcionny`i` ry`nok // Bibliografiia i knigovedenie. 2015. № 4. S. 8–13.

19. Pavlova A. S., Kirsanova A. I., Oganova O. A. Kompleksny`e issledovaniia informatcionny`kh potrebnostei` uchyony`kh UrO RAN v pechatny`kh periodicheskikh izdaniiakh // Nauchnaia periodika: problemy` i resheniia. 2015. № 3. S. 144–150.

20. Glushanovskii` A. V., Kalenov N. E. Informatcionny`e potrebnosti uchyony`kh i puti ikh udovletvoreniia // Aktual`ny`e problemy` informatcionnogo obespecheniia fundamental`ny`kh issledovanii` AN sotcialisticheskikh stran : I nauchny`i` simpozium informatcionny`kh organov AN sotcialisticheskikh stran. Moskva, 1988. S. 79–85.

21. Mokhnacheva Iu. V. Informatcionnoe obespechenie nauchny`kh issledovanii` akademicheskimi bibliotekami s ispol`zovaniem bibliometricheskikh metodov : avtoref. dis. ... kand. ped. nauk : 05.25.03. Moskva, 2008. 24 s.

22. Mazov N. A., Gureev V. N. Izuchenie informatcionny`kh potrebnostei` uchyony`kh s ispol`zovaniem bibliometricheskogo analiza dlia optimizatcii komplektovaniia // Bibliosfera. 2012. № 4. S. 57–66.

23. Neshcheret M. Iu. Izuchenie informatcionny`kh potrebnostei` v istoricheskoi` retrospektive // Bibliotekovedenie. 2020. T. 69. № 2. S. 147–157. doi: 10.25281/0869- 608X-2020-69-2-147-157

24. Podkory`tova N. I., Lakizo I. G. Biblioteka kak komponent obrazovatel`nogo i kul`turnogo potentciala territorii // Vestneyk Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul`turologiia i iskusstvovedenie. 2021. № 43. S. 305–318. doi: 10.17223/22220836/43/27

25. Vikhreva G. M., Podkory`tova N. I. Biblioteka i megapolis: dialog v sovremennom gumanitarnom prostranstve // Gumanitarny`e nauki v Sibiri. 2021, T. 28. № 4. S. 92–95. doi: 10.15372/HSS20210414

26. Podkory`tova N. I., Lakizo I. G., Artem`eva E. B. Nauchny`e biblioteki v nauchnoobrazovatel`nom komplekse Novosibirska // Nauchny`e i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2020. № 9. S. 61–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-9-61-77

27. Lakizo I. G., Deev V. G., Kuular M. Ch. Udovletvoryonnost` prepodavatelei` Novosibirska bibliotechno-informatcionny`m obespecheniem // Trudy` GPNTB SO RAN. 2021. № 4. S. 53–64. doi: 10.20913/2618-7575-2021-4-53-64

28. Lakizo I. G. Spros na dokumentny`e resursy` i uslugi biblioteki kak pokazatel` urovnia udovletvoryonnosti informatcionny`kh potrebnostei` studentov vuzov (na primere GPNTB SO RAN) // Nauchny`e i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2022. № 4. S. 54–77. doi: 10.33186/1027-3689-2022-4-54-77

29. Sharpilova G. A. Bibliotechno-informatcionnoe obsluzhivanie spetcialistov krupnogo promy`shlennogo goroda v usloviiakh razvitiia tcifrovoi` sredy` // Dvenadtcaty`e Makushinskie chteniia : materialy` mezhdunarodnoi` nauchnoi` konferentcii (Tiumen`, 25–27 maia 2021 g.). Novosibirsk, 2021. S. 440–447. doi: 10.20913/2618-6691-12-50