How the users find science journal articles in the digital environment
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2019-1-30-39
Abstract
The author discusses the most popular search services for science articles retrieval — which make the main information source for modem researchers. Based on the findings of the global sociological study of over 40,000 respondents, the services most popular with the users are compared. Among the most frequently used are: abstracted bibliographic databases, science retrieval services, global general search services, libraries’ www-sites, publishers’ www-sites, journals www-sites, and social networks. The author analyzes libraries’ potential for tuning popular services for the users to transit from brief article descriptions (bibliographic records) to their full texts available through subscriptions. To unify the exchange mode and formats, the requirements documents by the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) regulate data exchange between content providers (publishers and aggregators), discovery services developers and the libraries. Integration of Russian journal resources into the global exchange infrastructure is hindered by incompleteness and inconsistency of the metadata being provided. Meanwhile such integration is vital for Russian science article visibility and citation. The author also emphasizes the importance of the standardized data exchange between Russian content providers, discovery services, and the libraries.
About the Author
Nataliya Litvinova
Russian State Library
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Philology), Chief Librarian.
3/5 Vozdvizhenka st., 119019 MoscowReferences
1. Evstigneeva G. A. Natsionalnyy dostup к mezhdunarodnym bazam dannyh v ramkah federalnoy tselevoy programmy «Issledovaniya i razrabotki po prioritetnym napravleniyam razvitiya nauchno-tehnicheskogo kompleksa Rossii na 2014—2020 gody» / G. A. Evstigneeva // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. - 2016. - Me 5,- S. 29-43.
2. Gardner T., Inger S. How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Publications: Trends in Behaviour from 2005-2015 [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: http://digitalcommons. unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=scholcom (дата обращения: 10.05.2018).
3. De Rosa C., Cantrell X, Cellentani D., HawkX, Jenkins L. and Wilson A. Perceptions of Libraries, 2010: Context and Community, Dublin. OH: OCLC [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: https://www.oclc.org/en/reports/2010perceptions.html (дата обращения: 10.05.2018).
4. Shrayberg Ya. L., Goncharov M. V., Zemskov A. I., Kolosov K. A. Otkrytyy dostup: zarubezhnyy i otechestvennyy opyt — sostoyanie i perspektivy / Ya. L. Shrayberg, M. V. Goncharov, A. I. Zemskov, K. A. Kolosov// Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. — 2012. —Me8.—S. 5—26.
5. Johnson R., Fosci M. Putting down roots: Securing the liiture of open-access policies. Knowledge Exchange report of Workshop held on the 10th of November 2015.
6. Piwowar H., Priem J., Lariviere V., Alperin J. P., Matthias L., Norlander B., Farley A., West J., Haustein S. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. // PeerJ 6:e4375 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
7. Open access availability of scientific publications [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: http://www.science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/science-metrix_open_access_availability_scientific_publications_report.pdf (дата обращения: 10.05.2018).
8. Archambault Е., Cote G., Struck В., VooronsM. Research impact of paywalled versus open access papers [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: http://www.lscience.com/oanumbr.html (дата обращения: 10.05.2018).
Review
For citations:
Litvinova N. How the users find science journal articles in the digital environment. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2019;(1):30-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2019-1-30-39
Views:
1440
Email this article 