Bibliographical activity in the networked information environment
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2019-7-37-53
Abstract
Challenges of the digital information environment web 2.0 transform the ways of bibliographic activities. Among the features of digital information environment are unstructured and heterogeneous data that consist digital information sources; erasing differences between publish and unpublish information that complicates the universal bibliographic control and selection of the information sources for libraries’ collections; also the role of the user in the semantic web is changing from passive use of information to active involving in information creation, development and management, or human information interaction. The main trends of bibliographic activities in the digital information environment are the development of bibliographic metadata formats in the context of the universal bibliographic control of the digital sources web 2.0; design of the information architecture web 2.0 and information systems using the bibliographic principles of document identification, description, classification and labeling for digital documents and data and taking into account the usability and human factors requirements; management of folksonomies and web-services for user’s personal bibliographic activities; usage of cloud computing to develop digital libraries and bibliographic services; integration libraries online catalogs with the interfaces of internet search engines in discovery systems; using new infometrics like altmetrics for bibliographic researches.
About the Author
A. Gruzova
St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Information Management Chair
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Information Management Chair
References
1. Bashmakov A. I. Mnogoplatformennaya mul'tiformatnaya avtomatizirovannaya bibliotechno-informatsionnaya sistema «MARK Cloud»: opyt sozdaniya oblachnykh bibliotechnykh setei i integratsii elektronnykh resursov / A. I. Bashmakov, V. V. Popov // Kniga. Kul'tura. Obrazovanie. Innovatsii. «Krym-2017». – 2017. – S. 36–41.
2. Busygina T. V. Al'tmetriya kak kompleks novykh instrumentov dlya otsenki produktov nauchnoi deyatel'nosti / T. V. Busygina // Idei i idealy. – 2016. – T. 2, № 2 (28). – S. 79–87.
3. Galyavieva M. S. Infometricheskie issledovaniya v bibliotekakh: ot bibliometrii do al'tmetrii / M. S. Galyavieva // Tr. GPNTB SO RAN. – 2015. – № 8. – S. 46–51.
4. Gendina N. I. Biblioteka v edinom informatsionnom prostranstve: neobkhodimost' sozdaniya elektronnykh putevoditelei po internet-resursam / N. I. Gendina, N. I. Kolkova // Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki. – 2018. – № 7. – S. 43–59.
5. Kutovenko A. A. Oblachnye tekhnologii v bibliotechnom dele / A. A. Kutovenko ; RIIT BNTU. – Minsk, 2017. – 37 s.
6. Litvinova N. N. Kak pol'zovateli nakhodyat stat'i iz nauchnykh zhurnalov v elektronnoi srede / N. N. Litvinova // Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki. – 2019. – № 1. – S. 30–39.
7. Protopopova E. E. Funktsionirovanie bibliotek v oblachnoi telekommunikatsionnoi srede / E. E. Protopopova // Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki. – 2016. – № 2. – S. 42–54.
8. Smirnov Yu. V. Oblachnye vychisleniya: istoriya i vliyanie na budushchee bibliotek / Yu. V. Smirnov // Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki. – № 6. – S. 62–73.
9. Sukiasyan E. R. Kak mozhno reorganizovat' poisk v elektronnykh katalogakh / E. R. Sukiasyan // Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki. – 2017. – № 5. – S. 10–21.
10. Shraiberg Ya. L. Biblioteki, muzei, vuzy i knizhnyi rynok v edinom informatsionnom pros-transtve / Ya. L. Shraiberg // Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki. – 2017. – № 9. – S. 3–70.
11. Altmetrics [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://altmetrics.org.
12. Dunsire G. Reconsidering Universal Bibliographic Control in Light of the Semantic Web / G. Dunsire, D. Hillmann, J. Phipps // Journal of Library Metadata. – 2012. – Vol. 12, № 2–3. – P. 164–176.
13. Emanuel J. Users and citation management tools: use and support / J. Emanuel // Reference Services Review. – 2013. – Т. 41. – № 4. – С. 639–659.
14. Hensley M. K. Citation management software: Features and futures / M. K. Hensley // Reference & User Services Quarterly. – 2011. – Т. 50. – № 3. – С. 204–208.
15. Holmberg K. Altmetrics for Information Professionals Past, Present and Future / K. Holmberg. – Amsterdam, etc. : Elsevier : Chandos Publishing, 2016. – 159 p.
16. Hull D. Defrosting the digital library: bibliographic tools for the next generation web [Electronic resource] / D. Hull, S. R. Pettifer, D. B. Kell // PLoS computational biology. – URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000204.
17. IFLA Professional Statement on Universal Bibliographic Control [Electronic resource] / IFLA. – 2012. – URL: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/bibliography/Documents/IFLA%20Professional%20Statement%20on%20UBC.pdf.
18. Ivey C. Choosing the right citation management tool: EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks, or Zotero / C. Ivey, J. Crum // Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. – 2018. – Т. 106. – № 3. – С. 399.
19. Keyser P. Indexing. From Thesauri to the Semantic Web / P. de Keyser. – Oxford : Chandos Publishing, 2012. – XXI, 249 p.
20. Martín-Martín A. The counting house: Measuring those who count. Presence of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and altmetrics in the Google Scholar citations, Researcherid, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter [Electronic resource] / A. Martín-Martín [et al.] // arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.02412. – 2016. – P. 1–60. – https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1602/1602.02412.pdf
21. Meaningful metrics : a 21st century librarian’s guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics, and research impact / ed. R. Chin Roemer, R. Borchardt. – Chicago : Association of College and Research Libraries: a division of the American Library Association, 2015. – VII, 241 p.
22. Nashipudi M. Web 2.0 and folksonomy / M. Nashipudi // International journal of digital library services. – 2012. – Vol. 2, № 1. – P. 29–35.
23. Parabhoi L. Citation Management Software Tools: a Comparison with Special Reference to Zotero and Mendeley / L. Parabhoi, A. K. Seth, S. K. Pathy // Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science. – 2017. – Т. 6. – № 3. – С. 288–293.
24. Peters I. Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 / I. Peters ; transl. from German by P. Becker. – Berlin : De Gruyter, 2009. – VI, 443 p.
25. Priem J. Altmetrics: a manifesto [Electronic resource] / J. Priem, D. Taraborelli, P. Groth, C. Neylon. – URL: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
26. Rowley J. Organizing knowledge: an introduction to managing access to information / J. Rowley, R. Hartley. – 3d ed. – New York : Routledge, 2018. – XIX, 404 p.
27. Shi X. An empirical review of library discovery tools / X. Shi, S. Levy // Journal of service science and management. – 2015. – Vol. 8, № 5. – P. 716–725.
28. Wells D. How do library clients use discovery systems? [Electronic resource] / D. Wells, C. Richardson // LIANZA Conference, 12–15 October, 2014, Auckland, New Zealand. – 7 p. – URL: https://lianza.org.nz/sites/default/files/Wells_D_How_do_Library_Clients_Use_Discovery_Systems.pdf.
29. Zapounidou S. Representing and integrating bibliographic information into the Semantic Web: A comparison of four conceptual models / S. Zapounidou, M. Sfakakis, C. Papatheodorou // Journal of information science. – 2017. – Т. 43. – № 4. – С. 525–553.
Review
For citations:
Gruzova A. Bibliographical activity in the networked information environment. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2019;(7):37-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2019-7-37-53
Views:
1952
Email this article 