The bibliometrical analysis of document flow within the topic “Research methods” (based on VINITI RAS Abstracts Journal “Informatics”)
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-4-99-114
Abstract
Today the scientific research has become of increased significance for the library activities. This calls for implementing new research methods.
The Abstracts Journal “Informatics” was analyzed for the publications on “Research methods” for the 10-year period; the findings are discussed, i.e. the rise of interest methods in the library and information community toward applying research, positive dynamics of the document flow with the 10-year doubling period. Over 100 research methods are identified. Thematically, the stable part of the document flows make approximately one-fifth of the total volume. Twenty three methods are used most frequently. The subject headings for these methods demonstrate stability which means permanent interest toward these methods and stable vectors of research methods development. Metric methods are dominating, including those being used in the digital environment. The increase of subject headings efficiency evidences on their increasing relevancy. Mobile document flows characterize the newest research methods. These are the methods being borrowed from other fields and used occasionally in the library and information studies. “The research methods” topic appears to be a trending and a developing one. The core methods are defined. Nevertheless, the major part of the document flow remains decentralized and comprises many new vectors that, while being quite relevant, have not found their niche in the library science research.
About the Authors
G. I. Sbitneva
Kemerovo State Institute of Culture
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina I. Sbitneva – Cand. Sc. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Chair for Documental Communications Technology
Kemerovo
O. V. Dvorovenko
Kemerovo State Institute of Culture
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Dvorovenko – Cand. Sc. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor
Kemerovo
References
1. Kreydenko V. Struktura nauchno-issledovatelskogo metoda i terminologicheskaya traktovka ee elementov // Bibliosfera. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 9–22.
2. Bibliotekovedenie. Obshchiy kurs : ucheb. dlya bakalavrov, obuchayushchihsya po napravleniyu podgotovki 071900.62 «Bibl.-inform. deyatelnost» / S. A. Basov, A. N. Vaneev, M. Ya. Dvorkina i dr. ; nauch. red.: A. N. Vaneev, M. N. Kolesnikova. – Sankt-Peterburg : Professiya, 2013. – 240 s.
3. Bondarev I. P. Kontseptsii sovremennogo estestvoznaniya : ucheb. posobie / I. P. Bondarev. – Moskva, 2003. – 464 s.
4. Kozhevnikova L. A. Metodologiya sotsiokulturnogo issledovaniya: bibliotechnaya otrasl : krat. ponyatiyno-terminolog. slov. / L. A. Kozhevnikova, B. C. Kreydenko, I. A. Valdman. – Novosibirsk : Izd-vo NGTU, 2017. – 66 s.
5. Kreydenko V. S. Bibliotechnye issledovaniya : ucheb.-metod. posobie. – Moskva : Rus. shk. bibl. assots., 2007. – 351 s.
6. Kreydenko V. S. Spetsialnye metody issledovaniya v bibliotekovedenii. Neobhodimost razvitiya, izucheniya i primeneniya // Bibl. delo. – 2013. – № 13. – S. 22–28.
7. Filosofiya : entsikl. slov. / pod red. A. A. Ivina. – Moskva, 2004. – 1072 s.
8. Kreydenko V. S. Metody nauchnogo poznaniya v avtoreferatah doktorskih dissertatsiy. Spetsialnost 05.25.03 «Bibliotekovedenie, bibliografovedenie, knigovedenie» // Bibliosfera. – 2009. – № 9. – S. 3–9.
9. Trudy GPNTB SO RAN / Gos. publ. nauch.-tehn. b-ka Sib. otd-niya Ros. akad. nauk ; otv. red. B. S. Elepov. – Novosibirsk : GPNTB SO RAN, 2015. – Vyp. 9. – 152 s.
10. Trudy GPNTB SO RAN / Gos. publ. nauch.-tehn. b-ka Sib. otd-niya Ros. akad. nauk; otv. red.: E. B. Artemeva, O. L. Lavrik. – Novosibirsk : GPNTB SO RAN, 2016. - Vyp. 10. – 584 s.
11. Lavrik O. L. Osobennosti nauchnyh issledovaniy v bibliotekah raznogo statusa // Tr. GPNTB SO RAN / Gos. publ. nauch.-tehn. b-ka Sib. otd-niya Ros. akad. nauk; otv. red.: E. B. Artemeva, O. L. Lavrik. – Novosibirsk : GPNTB SO RAN, 2016. – Vyp. 10. – S. 6–17.
12. Busygina T. V., Mandrinina L. A. Deyatelnost otdela nauchnoy bibliografii GPNTB SO RAN po informatsionnoy podderzhke sibirskoy nauki // Bibliotekovedenie. – 2018. – T. 67. – № 6. – S. 690–700.
13. Zemskov A. I. Osnovnye zadachi bibliotek v oblasti bibliometrii // Inform. i innovatsii. – 2017. – № 5. – S. 79–83.
14. Taranenko L. G. Izuchenie polzovateley kraevedcheskoy informatsii v obshchedostupnyh bibliotekah: rezultaty anketirovaniya // Bibliografiya. – 2017. – № 6 (413). – S. 27–36.
15. Shaburova N. N. Dlya chego nuzhna biblioteka nauchno-issledovatelskogo instituta: vzglyad iznutri // Tr. GPNTB SO RAN / Gos. publ. nauch.-tehn. b-ka Sib. otd-niya Ros. akad. nauk; otv. red.: E. B. Artemeva, O. L. Lavrik. – Novosibirsk : GPNTB SO RAN, 2017. – Vyp. 12-1. – S. 142–159.
16. Tretyakov A. L., Korol A. N. Ispolzovanie metodov biblio- i vebometrii pri izuchenii mikropotoka bibliotekovedcheskih zhurnalov // Bibliosfera. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 69–74.
17. Okladnikova A. B. Benchmarking kak tehnologiya uluchsheniya deyatelnosti bibliotechnyh organizatsiy // Izv. Baykal. gos. un-ta. – 2008. – № 1 (57). – S. 88–90.
18. Opekunova E. N. Parametry otsenki deyatelnosti vuzovskoy biblioteki v kontekste izmeneniy ee zadach // Bibliosfera. – 2017. – № 1. – S. 38–45.
Review
For citations:
Sbitneva G.I., Dvorovenko O.V. The bibliometrical analysis of document flow within the topic “Research methods” (based on VINITI RAS Abstracts Journal “Informatics”). Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2020;(4):99-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-4-99-114
Views:
871
Email this article 