Approaches to studying library collection quality
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-5-33-52
Abstract
The quality of library collection is hard to evaluate due to its non-specificity and inconstancy, as well as due to the multiplicity of evaluation specifications. Besides, within the contemporary library collection studies, the concept of “library collection quality” does not correspond with criteria and indicators being suggested. To harmonize disparate requirements and quality specifications, the author applies the polysystem approach which contemplates examining collections as an element of larger systems. Each system, with its own goals, structure and functions, offers its specific requirements. The quality of library collections is analyzed from the viewpoint of structural and functional, technological, marketing, regionological, and culturological approaches. Within every macrosystem, structural elements are defined; their impact upon library collection quality is discussed. The social systems of greater global character (culture, region, market) put forward the requirements reflecting the needs and expectations of the society on the whole, regional communities and individual consumers, correspondingly. These requirements differ depending on the collections, library type and subordination, its goals and strategies and are specified in the library collection models — used as guidelines for designing the library’s technological system. Developing the quality indicators systems for each type of collection interaction within the macrosystems for every library type should become the next stage of library collection quality studies.
About the Author
O. N. MorevaRussian Federation
Olga N. Moreva – Cand. Sc. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Document Communiction Technologies Chair
Kemerovo
References
1. Martynova E. V. Teoreticheskie predposylki izucheniya kachestva fondov I praktika ego izmereniya v TSBS : avtoref. dis. … kand. ped. nauk : 05.25.03. – Leningrad, 1981. – 15 s.
2. Martynova E. V. Teoreticheskie predposylki izucheniya kachestva bibliotechnogo fonda // Nauch. I tekhn. b-ki SSSR. – 1981. – № 8. – S. 25–27.
3. Firsov V. R. Biblioteka kak sotsial'nyj institut. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty povysheniya ee roli v razvitom sotsialisticheskom obshhestve : dis. … kand. ped. nauk : 05.25.03. / V. R. Firsov. – Leningrad, 1984. – 223 s.
4. Zagumennaya V. V. Sistema bibliograficheskogo obespecheniya komplektovaniya kak faktor uluchsheniya kachestva bibliotechnykh fondov : avtoref. dis. ... kand. ped. nauk : 05.25.03 / V. V. Zagumennaya. – Moskva, 1991. – 18 s.
5. Seliverstova E. T. Polnota I sootvetstvie – kategorii kachestva bibliotechnogo fonda // Nauch. I tekhn. b-ki. – 1987. – № 9. – S. 8–12.
6. Stolyarov YU. N. Bibliotechnyj fond : ucheb. dlya stud. bibl. fak-tov in-tov kul'tury, un-tov i ped. vuzov / Yu. N. Stolyarov. – Moskva : Kn. palata, 1991. – 272 s.
7. Stolyarov Yu. N. Bibliotechnyj fond : ucheb. / Yu. N. Stolyarov. – Sankt-Peterburg : Professiya, 2015. – 384 s.
8. Stolyarov Yu. N. Formirovanie bibliotechnogo fonda : prakt. posobie / Yu. N. Sto¬lyarov. – Sankt-Peterburg : Professiya, 2015. – 508 s.
9. Bibliotechnyj fond : slov.-sprav. / sost. E. I. Ratnikova, N. Z. Starodubova, L. M. Tol-chinskaya ; nauch. red.: Yu. N. Stolyarov. – Moskva : INFRА-M, 2017. – 160 s.
10. Spravochnik bibliotekarya / nauch. red. А. N. Vaneev. – 4-e izd., pererab. I dop. – Sankt-Peterburg : Professiya, 2011. – 640 s.
11. Moreva O. N. Trebovaniya k kachestvu bibliotechnogo fonda / O. N. Moreva // Biblios-fera. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 17–22.
12. Kuz'min V. P. Istoricheskie predposylkii gnoseologicheskie osnovaniya sistemnogo podkhoda / V. P. Kuz'min // Psikholog. zhurnal. – 1982. – T. 3. – № 3. – S. 3–13.
13. Stolyarov Yu. N. Biblioteka : strukturno-funktsional'nyj podkhod / Yu. N. Stolyarov. – Moskva : Kniga, 1981. – 255 s.
14. Pilko I. S. Informatsionnye i bibliotechnye tekhnologii : ucheb. posobie / I. S. Pilko. – Sankt-Peterburg : Professiya, 2006. – 501 s.
15. Moreva O. N. Upravlenie kachestvom bibliotechnogo fonda / O. N. Moreva // Inform. byulleten' RBА. – 2011. – № 59. – S. 126–129.
16. GOST R ISO 9000-2015 Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva. Osnovnye polozheniya I slovar' [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. – URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200124393/. – Zagl. s ehkrana.
17. Ehjdemiller I. V. Strategiya formirovaniya fondov publichnykh bibliotek: marketingovyj podkhod / I. V. Ehjdemiller ; Ros. nats. b-ka. – Sankt-Peterburg, 1995. – 124 s.
18. Kotler F. Marketing menedzhment / F. Kotler ; per. s angl. pod red. O. Tret'yak, L. Volkovoj, Yu. Kapturevskogo. – 9-e mezhdunar. izd. – Sankt-Peterburg : Piter, 2005. – 800 s.
19. Tovarovedenie, ehkspertiza I standartizatsiya / А. А. Lyashko, А. P. Khodykin, N. I. Voloshko. – 2-e izd. – Moskva : Dashkov i Ko, 2017. – 660 s.
20. Moreva O. N. Kachestvo bibliotechnogo fonda v ehpokhu informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologij / O. N. Moreva // Bibliotekovedenie. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 45–49.
21. Moreva O. N. Dokumentnye fondy bibliotek I informatsionnykh sluzhb / O. N. Moreva. – Sankt-Peterburg : Professiya, 2010. – 400 s.
22. Cherkasov P. S. Region kak sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskaya sistema / P. S. Cherkasov // Problemy sovrem. ehkonomiki. – 2013. – № 2 (46). – S. 212–214.
23. Kochergin А. N. Kul'tura kak sistema / А. N. Kochergin // Vestn. Tom. gos. ped. un-ta. – 2008. – № 1. – S. 109–115.
24. Kagan M. S. O substantsii, stroenii I funktsiyakh kul'tury (k voprosu obosnovaniyakh kul'turologii) / M. S. Kagan // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshhestvo. – 2004. – T. 6. – Vyp. 2 (22). – S. 123–134.
25. Sukonkina O. I. Bibliotechnyj fond v sisteme kul'turnoj kommunikatsii : avtoref. dis. … kand. kul'turologii: 24.00.01 / O. I. Sukonkina ; [Mordov. gos. un-t im. N. P. Ogareva]. – Saransk, 2006. – 18 s.
26. Moreva O. N. Trebovaniya k kachestvu bibliotechnogo fonda v kul'turologicheskikh issledovaniyakh rossijskikh bibliotekovedov / O. N. Moreva // Bibliosfera. – 2016. – № 2. – S. 16–25.
Review
For citations:
Moreva O.N. Approaches to studying library collection quality. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2020;(5):33-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-5-33-52