Quality of library staff training in the context of labor market re-quirements
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-8-27-38
Abstract
The article analyses the key factors affecting the assessment of the quality of higher education by the state, the labor market and the individual based on the methodology of the subjective approach.
It shows the transformation of the requirements for job candidates that were traditional for the previous stages of reproduction of competent labor, the key ones becominginterdisciplinary competencies: creativity, speed of cognitive reactions, team work skills, result orientation, etc.
Expert opinions’ analysis is performed to identify the professions of the nearest future. This analysis is the basis for the study of the potential for training the specialists in the area of library and information activities. It is shown that in a broad sense, the library as the most important socio-cultural institution has no alternatives. It presents examples of job specifics that correspond with the realities of the IV Industrial revolution and are designed to form the information culture of the society and develop socio-cultural communications.
The specifics of personal preferences on the desired quality of education as a factor in achieving life goals are studied. There is a trend on a reduction of the number of people considering the higher education being a “social lift”. This fact strongly affects the subjective perception of the rating of the chosen higher education specializations and the corresponding higher educational institutions.
About the Author
M. L. LevitskyRussian Federation
Mikhail L. Levitsky – academician of Russian Education Academy, Doctor of science, Professor, DBA (doctor of business administration – Economics), Academician secretary of the Department of philosophy of education and theoretical pedagogy of RAO, winner of the Russian Government award in the field of education
Moscow
References
1. Levitsky, M. L. Methodological prerequisites for research on the effectiveness of edu-cation // Bulletin of the Moscow state University. Economics series. – 2016. – № 2.
2. Kugayenko, A. A., Levitsky M. L. Methods and models for determining the economic efficiency of public education. – Moscow : Prometheus, 1990.
3. Nezavisimaya Gazeta. – 07.08.2019.
4. Danilyuk, A. Ya., Faktorovich A. A. Digital General education. – Moscow : publishing house “Author's workshop”. 2019. – P. 104.
5. Digital skills Training: global challenges and best practices. Analytical report for the III International conference “More than training: how to develop digital skills”; Sberbank Corporate University, Moscow : ANO DPO “Sberbank Corporate University”, 2018. – Author's team under the direction of V. S. Katkalo and D. L. Volkov. – P. 29.
6. Internet resource www.garant.ru. Order of the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation dated August 11, 2016 № 1001 “on approval of the Federal state educational standard of higher education in the field of training 51.03.06 Library and information activities (bachelor's level)”.
7. Atlas of new professions. Internet resource. – URL: www.Atlas100.ru.
8. 100 professions of the future. Internet resource. – URL: www.rbc.ru.
9. Analytical review. Internet resource. – URL: www.Wciom.ru (2019).
10. Sociological “attitude of young people to the sphere of education”. Multifunctional center “Chance”. 2018. Internet resource. – URL: www.dmoshans.ru.
Review
For citations:
Levitsky M.L. Quality of library staff training in the context of labor market re-quirements. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2020;(8):27-38. https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-8-27-38