Analysis of the demand for research results in the fieldof energy and related industries

The paper analyzes the importance of power engineering for solving a wide range of practical problems. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of the research of scientists and specialists in 2013–2019 in power engineering, electrical engineering, electronics and radio engineering on the basis of RSCI databases (Russian Science Citation Index). The analysis was carried out taking into account a number of scientometric indicators: the publication activity of researchers – the annual number of their publications, as well as the citation of these publications and the demand for the results of their work. Features of dynamics of formation of indicators of publication activity are revealed: its high values are typical for electronics and radio engineering and minimum values (more than three times smaller) – for electrical engineering. For all three industries analyzed the number of publications increased in 2013–2018. It is noted that the citation indicators for the three industries have been continuously decreasing since 2014. At the same time, in the field of electronics and radio engineering in 2013–2017, citation rates are three or more times higher than similar indicators for energy and electrical engineering. The results of research in the field of electronics and radio engineering are the most popular, while the results of research in the energy sector are the least popular. At the same time, the annual demand for research results in electronics and radio engineering exceeds similar indicators for energy by about 1.4 times. The low demand indicators for all areas of research in 2019 are obviously due to the same reason as for small citation indicators this year: the slow “response” of the scientific community to this year's publications.

power engineering, electrical engineering, electronics and radio engineering, citation, publication activity, RSCI, efficiency of scientific research, demand for results

1. Arutyunov V. V. Metody otsenki rezultatov nauchnyh issledovaniy. – Moskva : GPNTB Rossii, 2010. – 50 s.

2. Arutyunov V. V. Pokazateli effektivnosti ergotehnicheskih sistem // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. – 2014. – № 6. – S. 5–14.

3. Arutyunov V. V. Osobennosti reytinga tsitiruemosti rossiyskih uchenyh po versii RINTS // Tam zhe. – 2015. – № 5. – S. 28–43.

4. Arutyunov V. V. Rezultativnost nauchnoy deyatelnosti opornyh vuzov Rossii // Tam zhe. – 2018. – № 3. – S. 33–43.

5. Logunova O. S., Ilina E. A. Effektivnost upravleniya publikatsionnoy aktivnostyu professorsko-prepodavatelskogo sostava Instituta energetiki i avtomatizirovannyh sistem // Fundament. issled. – 2016. – № 12 (ch. 4). – S. 748–753.

6. Marcusova V. A., Mindeli L. E., Rubvalter D. A., Zolotova A. V., Akoev M. A., Leebkind A. N. Dinahmika publikatsionnoy aktivnosti Rossii v oblasti energii i topliva za 2008–2017 gg. // Nauch.-tehn. inform. – Ser. 2. – 2019. – № 12. – S. 1–11.

7. Arutyunov V. V., Grishina N. V. Otsenka rezultativnosti nauchnoy deyatelnosti rossiyskih uchenyh: klasternyy analiz (na primere estestvenno-nauchnyh otrasley) // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. – 2018. – № 9. – S. 77–92.

8. Gosudarstvennyy rubrikator nauchno-tehnicheskoy informatsii Rossii [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: https://elibrary.ru/rubrics.asp.

9. Rossiyskiy indeks nauchnogo tsitirovaniya [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: https://elibrary.ru/querybox.asp?scope=newquery.

10. Ershova S. K. Instruktsiya po ispolzovaniyu RINTS [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: https://eeip.ru/about-organization/rints.html.