Methodology of assessing Russian science journals citation in six domains according to Web of Science Core Collection. Part 1
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2021-4-53-72
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
The authors develop and substantiate the methods of assessing Russian science journals citation in six domains as specified by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and, based on Web of Science Core Collection data, make recommendations for promoting Russian journals to the international databases. The authors analyze the methods of citing science journals indexed by the international systems and conclude that there was a need for additional indicators of citation assessment with consideration to the national origins of publications. They suggest the methodological approach based on calculating citation coefficient which is a modified version of impact factor. The key distinctions of the method are the following: the number of citing documents are applied instead of the quotation number; only one document type, i.e. academic papers, is used for calculations; citation widows are varied depending on specificity of six OECD science domains. To distribute articles among the domains the authors developed the OECD – Web of Science Core Collection compliance tables.
About the Authors
V. V. LapochkinaRussian Federation
Victoria V. Lapochkina – Cand. Sc. (Economics), Assoc. Prof., Head, Sector for Strategic Development Monitoring in Science and Innovations
Moscow
V. N. Dolgova
Russian Federation
Vladislava N. Dolgova – Cand. Sc. (Economics), Assoc. Prof., Head, Sector for Socio-Economic Development Monitoring in Science and Technology
Moscow
K. S. Dikusar
Russian Federation
Konstantin S. Dikusar – Junior Researcher
Moscow
V. V. Bogatov
Russian Federation
Victor V. Bogatov – Researcher
Moscow
References
1. Matthew E. F., Vangelis G. A. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation // Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. - 2008. - 56. - P. 223-226.
2. Tretyakova O. V. K voprosu ob impakt-faktore nauchnogo zhurnala i metodikah ego formirovaniya // Vopr. territorial. razvitiya. - 2014. - № 5 (15). - S. 1-9.
3. Adler R., Ewing J., and Taylor P. A report from the international mathematical union (IMU) in cooperation with the international council of industrial and applied mathematics (ICIAM) and the institute of mathematical statistics (IMS), Stat. Sci. - 2009. - Vol. 24 (1). - P. 1-14.
4. Arnold D. N., Fowler K. K. Nefarious numbers // Notices American Mathematical Society. - 2011. - Vol. 8 (3). - P. 434-437.
5. Mazov N. A., Gureev V. N. Alternative approaches to assessing scientific results // Herald of the Russian academy of Sciences. - 2015. - Vol. 85. - № 1. - P. 26-32.
6. Campbell P. Escape from the impact factor // Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit. - 2008. - Vol. 8 (1). - P. 5-7.
7. The impact factor game: It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature // PLoS Medicine. - 2006. - Vol. 3 (6). - P. 707-708.
8. Douglas N. A., Kristine K. F. Nefarious Numbers // Notices of the American mathematical society. - 2011. - 58 (3). - P. 434-437.
9. Garfield E. Journal impact factor: a brief review // CMAJ. - 1999. - Vol. 161. - P. 979-980.
10. Gonzalez Alcaide G., Valderrama Zurian J. C., Aleixandre-Benavent R. The impact factor in non-English-speaking countries // Scientometrics. - 2012. - Vol. 92 (2). - P. 297-311.
11. Marshakova-Shaikevich I. V. Journal co-citation analysis in the field of information science and library science // In Language, information and communication studies. P. Nowak & M. Gorny (Eds.). - Poznan : Adam Mieckiewicz University. - 2003. - P. 87-96.
12. Pislyakov V. V. Soavtorstvo rossiyskih uchenyh s zarubezhnymi kollegami: publikatsii i ih tsitiruemost : preprint WP6/2010/01. - Moskva : Izdat. dom gos. un-ta - Vyssh. shk. ekonomiki, 2010. - 40 s.
13. Aleskerov F. T., Badgaeva D. N., Pislyakov V. V., Sterligov I. A., Shvydun S. V.
14. Znachimost osnovnyh rossiyskih i mezhdunarodnyh ekonomicheskih zhurnalov: setevoy analiz // NEA. - № 2 (30). - 2016. - S. 193-205.
15. Rousseau R. Are multi-authored articles cited more than single-authored ones? Are collaborations with authors from other countries more cited than collaborations within the country? A case study, 2005. - URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ronald_Rousseau_2/4.
16. Leimu R., Koricheva J. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? // Trends in Ecology and Evolution. - 2005. - Vol. 20. - Iss. 1. - P. 28-32.
17. Mohnacheva Yu. V. Soavtorstvo v nauchnyh publikatsiyah rossiyskih uchenyh v oblasti molekulyarnoy biologii i ego vliyanie na nauchnuyu produktivnost // Knizh. kultura narodov Sibiri i Dalnego Vostoka na rubezhe XX-XXI vekov. - 2015. - S. 115-133.
18. Caroline S. Wagner, Travis A. Whetsell, Loet Leydesdorff. Growth of International Collaboration in Science: Revisiting Six Specialties // Scientometrics. - 2017. - Vol. 110 (3). - P. 1633-1652.
19. C. S. Wagner, T. A. Whetsell, S. Mukherjee. International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination // Research Policy, Elsevier. - 2019. - Vol. 48 (5). - P. 1260-270.
20. Priem J., Groth P., Taraborelli D. The Altmetrics Collection. Editorial Material. - 2012. - Vol. 7 (11). - URL: journals.plos.org.
21. Revised field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the Frascati Manual [Elektronnyy resurs]. - URL: https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/38235147.pdf
Review
For citations:
Lapochkina V.V., Dolgova V.N., Dikusar K.S., Bogatov V.V. Methodology of assessing Russian science journals citation in six domains according to Web of Science Core Collection. Part 1. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2021;(4):53-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2021-4-53-72
ISSN 2686-8601 (Online)