1. Matthew E. F., Vangelis G. A. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation // Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. - 2008. - 56. - P. 223-226.
2. Tretyakova O. V. K voprosu ob impakt-faktore nauchnogo zhurnala i metodikah ego formirovaniya // Vopr. territorial. razvitiya. - 2014. - № 5 (15). - S. 1-9.
3. Adler R., Ewing J., and Taylor P. A report from the international mathematical union (IMU) in cooperation with the international council of industrial and applied mathematics (ICIAM) and the institute of mathematical statistics (IMS), Stat. Sci. - 2009. - Vol. 24 (1). - P. 1-14.
4. Arnold D. N., Fowler K. K. Nefarious numbers // Notices American Mathematical Society. - 2011. - Vol. 8 (3). - P. 434-437.
5. Mazov N. A., Gureev V. N. Alternative approaches to assessing scientific results // Herald of the Russian academy of Sciences. - 2015. - Vol. 85. - № 1. - P. 26-32.
6. Campbell P. Escape from the impact factor // Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit. - 2008. - Vol. 8 (1). - P. 5-7.
7. The impact factor game: It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature // PLoS Medicine. - 2006. - Vol. 3 (6). - P. 707-708.
8. Douglas N. A., Kristine K. F. Nefarious Numbers // Notices of the American mathematical society. - 2011. - 58 (3). - P. 434-437.
9. Garfield E. Journal impact factor: a brief review // CMAJ. - 1999. - Vol. 161. - P. 979-980.
10. Gonzalez Alcaide G., Valderrama Zurian J. C., Aleixandre-Benavent R. The impact factor in non-English-speaking countries // Scientometrics. - 2012. - Vol. 92 (2). - P. 297-311.
11. Marshakova-Shaikevich I. V. Journal co-citation analysis in the field of information science and library science // In Language, information and communication studies. P. Nowak & M. Gorny (Eds.). - Poznan : Adam Mieckiewicz University. - 2003. - P. 87-96.
12. Pislyakov V. V. Soavtorstvo rossiyskih uchenyh s zarubezhnymi kollegami: publikatsii i ih tsitiruemost : preprint WP6/2010/01. - Moskva : Izdat. dom gos. un-ta - Vyssh. shk. ekonomiki, 2010. - 40 s.
13. Aleskerov F. T., Badgaeva D. N., Pislyakov V. V., Sterligov I. A., Shvydun S. V.
14. Znachimost osnovnyh rossiyskih i mezhdunarodnyh ekonomicheskih zhurnalov: setevoy analiz // NEA. - № 2 (30). - 2016. - S. 193-205.
15. Rousseau R. Are multi-authored articles cited more than single-authored ones? Are collaborations with authors from other countries more cited than collaborations within the country? A case study, 2005. - URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ronald_Rousseau_2/4.
16. Leimu R., Koricheva J. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? // Trends in Ecology and Evolution. - 2005. - Vol. 20. - Iss. 1. - P. 28-32.
17. Mohnacheva Yu. V. Soavtorstvo v nauchnyh publikatsiyah rossiyskih uchenyh v oblasti molekulyarnoy biologii i ego vliyanie na nauchnuyu produktivnost // Knizh. kultura narodov Sibiri i Dalnego Vostoka na rubezhe XX-XXI vekov. - 2015. - S. 115-133.
18. Caroline S. Wagner, Travis A. Whetsell, Loet Leydesdorff. Growth of International Collaboration in Science: Revisiting Six Specialties // Scientometrics. - 2017. - Vol. 110 (3). - P. 1633-1652.
19. C. S. Wagner, T. A. Whetsell, S. Mukherjee. International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination // Research Policy, Elsevier. - 2019. - Vol. 48 (5). - P. 1260-270.
20. Priem J., Groth P., Taraborelli D. The Altmetrics Collection. Editorial Material. - 2012. - Vol. 7 (11). - URL: journals.plos.org.
21. Revised field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the Frascati Manual [Elektronnyy resurs]. - URL: https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/38235147.pdf