Preview

Scientific and Technical Libraries

Advanced search

High-Yield, Low-Risk Deselection in an Academic Library

https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2017-5-49-62

Abstract

In conjunction with a multi-year renovation of Concordia University's main library, a comprehensive collections reconfiguration project was launched. The new library floor plans provided for increased study space and a reduced footprint for stacks. Significant deselection of physical format materials such as circulating books, reference works, government publications, and microforms was therefore necessary in order to achieve the necessary space reduction and still maintain room for growth. Although different weeding strategies were developed for specific collections and disciplines, the key factors considered were usage, currency and duplication. By focusing on reducing duplication - multiple copies, superseded editions, replication across different formats - and using data extracted from the library system, it has been possible to remove a large volume of items with minimal decision making required from subject librarians. Virtually all weeded materials have been sent to a non-profit reseller or recycled, in keeping with the university's commitment to environmental sustainability. This approach has resulted in the removal of over 60,000 duplicate copies from the monograph collection alone. At the same time access has been retained to most unique content within the collection, allaying faculty concerns about library deselection. In less than two years the original goals of space reduction for print and microform holdings have been exceeded.

About the Author

Meredith Giffin
Concordia University Libraries, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Canada


References

1. Acadia, Spencer. 2016. “Books be Gone! Reducing an Academic Library’s Print Collection by Half to Meet Strategic Planning Initiatives and Participate in a Joint Library Resource-Sharing Facility”. Journal of Library Administration 56:144-157

2. Arbeeny, Pamela and Lloyd Chittenden. 2014. “An Ugly Weed: Innovative Deselection to Address a Shelf Space Crisis”. Journal of Library Innovation 5(1):78-90

3. Austen, Jane. 2010. Pride and Prejudice: An Annotated Edition. Edited by Patricia Meyer Spacks. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

4. Demas, Samuel and Mary E. Miller. 2012. “Rethinking Collection Management Plans: Shaping Collective Collections for the 21st Century”. Collection Management 37:168-187

5. Demas, Samuel and Mary E. Miller. 2012. “Rethinking Collection Management Plans: Shaping Collective Collections for the 21st Century”. Collection Management 37:168-187

6. “Discarding useless material”. 1911. New York Libraries 2(7):221-222

7. Gillies, Scott and Carol Stephenson. 2012. “Three Libraries, Three Weeding Projects: Collaborative Weeding Projects Within a Shared Print Repository”. Collection Management, 37:205-222

8. Gregory, Vicky L. 2011. Collection Development and Management for 21st Century Library Collections: An Introduction. New York: Neal-Schuman

9. Manley, Will. 1996. “The Manley Arts: If I Called This Column 'Weeding', You Wouldn't Read It”. Booklist 92(13):1108

10. Martin, Jim, Hitoshi Kamada and Mary Feeney. 2013. “A Systematic Plan for Managing Physical Collections at the University of Arizona Libraries”. Collection Management 38:226-242

11. Murphy, Elizabeth. 2013. “Assessing University Library Print Book Collections and Deselection: A Case Study at the National University of Ireland Maynooth”. New Review of Academic Librarianship 19:256-273. 10

12. Oliva, Victor T. 2016. “Deselection of Print Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences in the Digital Age”. Collection Building 35(2):37-47

13. Reich, Thomas. 2013. “Less is More: Origins of University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Collection Assessment Plan”. Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. doi:10.5703/1288284315262

14. Slote, Stanley J. 1997. Weeding Library Collections: Library Weeding Methods. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited

15. Snyder, Cynthia Ehret. 2014. “Data-Driven Deselection: Multiple Point Data Using a Decision Support Tool in an Academic Library”. Collection Management 39:17-31

16. Soma, Amy K. and Lisa M. Sjoberg. 2011. “More Than Just Low-Hanging Fruit: A Collaborative Approach to Weeding in Academic Libraries”. Collection Management 36:17-28

17. Ward, Suzanne M. 2015. Rightsizing the Academic Library Collection. Chicago: American Library Association

18. Way, Doug and Julie Garrison. 2013. “Developing and Implementing a Disapproval Plan: One University Library’s Experience”. College & Research Library News 74(6):284-287


Review

For citations:


Giffin M. High-Yield, Low-Risk Deselection in an Academic Library. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2017;(5):49-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2017-5-49-62

Views: 710


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1027-3689 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8601 (Online)