The cognitive paradigm in the modern bibliographic studies

The bibliography cognitive paradigm is substantiated as essential for the modern society evolving from the being information to the cognitive one. The origins and development of the paradigm reflection in the library and bibliographic studies are discussed. The key components of the cognitive paradigm theoretical core of bibliography, namely mission, concept, terms, that make bibliography a cognitive social institution, are examined. The bibliography social mission is defined as overcoming the cognitive gap by individual and collective society actors during the transition from the information to the cognitive stage. The relevancy of bibliography would rise significantly if it increases its cognitive potential and proves to be fully fledged, independent generator and distributor of knowledge – the concept of bibliographic studies cognitive paradigm. The author demonstrates that bibliography is able to accomplish every process of knowledge transformation: its socialization, externalization, combining and internalization. Within the cognitive paradigm, bibliography is defined as a cognitive institution of the knowledge society with the purpose of knowledge generation and distribution it focuses on the system aspects of the documented knowledge conceptual content. The author also proves the need for enhancing cognitive character of library bibliographic activities and suggests tools and methods to intellectialize its cognitive and information activities.

1. Astahova L. V. Kognitivno-informatsionnaya deyatelnost lichnosti v obshchestve znaniya // Nauch.-tehn. inform. Ser. 1: Organizatsiya i metodika inform. raboty. – 2016. – № 12. – S. 1–6.

2. Shironin V. M. Kognitivnaya sreda i institutsionalnoe razvitie. – Sankt-Peterburg : Izd-vo SPbGEU, 2013. – 264 s.

3. Reyser S. A. Hrestomatiya po russkoy bibliografii s XI veka po 1917 god. – Moskva : Goskultprosvetizdat, 1956. – 448 s.

4. Lovyagin A. M. Bibliologicheskie ocherki. – Peterburg, 1916. – 38 s.

5. Zdobnov N. V. Izbrannoe: trudy po bibliografovedeniyu i knigovedeniyu. – Moskva : Kniga, 1980. – 272 s.

6. Zubov Yu. S. Bibliografiya kak sistema svernutogo znaniya // Teoretiko-metodolog. problemy sovrem. sovet. bibliografovedeniya. – Moskva, 1981. – Vyp. 47. – S. 23–40.

7. Fokeev V. A. Priroda bibliograficheskogo znaniya. – Moskva, 1995. – 352 s.

8. Astahova L. V. Bibliografiya kak nauchnyy fenomen. – Moskva, 1997. – 338 s.

9. Slyadneva N. A. Informatsionno-analiticheskaya deyatelnost: problemy i perspektivy // Inform. resursy Rossii. – 2001. – № 2. – S. 2–14.

10. Crimeaskaya A. Hronologicheskaya shkala osnovnyh sobytiy v razvitii kontseptsii «upravleniya znaniyami» za rubezhom i v Rossii [Elektronnyy resurs]. - Rezhim dostupa: http://www.kmtec.ru/publications/library/select/chron_km.shtml (дата обращения: 18.12.2017).

11. K obshchestvam znaniya. Vsemirnyy doklad YUNESKO. – Parizh : Izd-vo YUNESKO, 2005. - Rezhim dostupa: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001418/141843r.pdfс (дата обращения: 18.12.2017).

12. Webster M. The role of the library in knowledge management. Knowledge Management: Social, Cultural and Theoretical Perspectives 2007: 77–91.

13. Kim YM, Abbas J. Adoption of Library 2.0 Functionalities by Academic Libraries and Users: A Knowledge Management Perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2010; 36 (3): 211–8.

14. Jin CF. On the Innovation of Library Management by Way of Knowledge Management. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on E-Education, E-Business and Information Management 2014; 91: 141–3.

15. Wang X. An Analysis of Knowledge Management of University Libraries. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium Management Science & Engineering (2014) 2014 : 88–92.

16. Niu L, Wang YH, Han XT, Jiao TX. A Review of Library Knowledge Management Research in China. In: Xiao X, editor Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education. 2015, p. 155–9.

17. Balague N, Duren P, Saarti J. Comparing the knowledge management practices in selected European higher education libraries. Library Management 2016; 37 (4–5): 182–94.

18. de Bem RM, Coelho C, Dandolini GA. Knowledge management framework to the university libraries. Library Management 2016; 37 (4–5): 221–36.

19. Ryabinina E. P. Sovremennye problemy tehnologii upravleniya znaniyami v biblioteke // Tr. SPb gos. in-ta kultury. – 2015. – T. 211. – S. 172–177.

20. Gordukalova G. F. Upravlenie znaniyami: informatsionnaya diagnostika novogo napravleniya i metodicheskie problemy podgotovki kadrov // Vestn. Chelyab. gos. akad. kultury i iskusstv. – 2006. – T. 9. – № 1. – S. 86–97.

21. Gordukalova G. F. Smyslovoy analiz tekstov // Bibliosfera. – 2010. – № 1. – S. 23–27.

22. Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revolyutsiy. – Moskva : AST, 2009. – 310 s.

23. Sokolov A. V., Berestova T. F. Paradigmy bibliografovedeniya: kniga, dokument, resurs: ocherki o proshlom i budushchem bibliograficheskoy nauki. – Chelyabinsk : ChGAKI, 2014. – 490 s.

24. Maceviciute E., Janonis O. Conceptions of bibliography in the Russian Federation: The Russian phenomenon of bibliographic theory. Libri. 2004. № 54 (1). Р. 30–42.

25. Astahova L. V., Smolina S. G. Realizatsiya kognitivno-kommunikatsionnoy sushchnosti informatsionnoy kompetentsii budushchih spetsialistov v vuzovskoy biblioteke // Vestn. Chelyab. gos. akad. kultury i iskusstv. – 2013. – № 4 (36). – S. 28–34.

26. Tikunova I. P. Kontseptualnaya model sovremennoy biblioteki: sotsialno-filosofskiy analiz : dis. ... kand. filos. nauk. – Arhangelsk, 2007. – 129 s.

27. Nonaka I., Takeuchi X. Kompaniya – sozdatel znaniya. Zarozhdenie i razvitie innovatsiy v yaponskih firmah. – Moskva : Olimp-Biznes, 2003. – 320 s.

28. Belonogov G.. G.., Gilyarevskiy R. S. Eshche raz o gnoseologicheskom statuse ponyatiya «informatsiya» // NTI. Ser. 2. Inform. protsessy i sistemy. – 2010. – № 2. – S. 1–6.

29. Gilyarevskiy R. S. Informatsionnyy menedzhment: upravlenie informatsiey, znaniyami, tehnologiey. – Samara : Professiya, 2009. – 304 s.

30. Gilyarevskiy R. S. O znacheniyah termina «informatsiya» // Vestn. Chelyab. gos. akad. kultury i iskusstv. – 2007. – T. 12. – № 2. – S. 5–11.

31. Rakitov A. I. Filosofskie problemy nauki: Sistemnyy podhod. – Moskva : Mysl, 1977. – 270 s.

32. Gordukalova G. F. Strukturnye osobennosti professionalnoy kompetentsii analiticheskogo tipa // Vestn. SPb gos. un-ta kultury i iskusstv. – 2015. – № 1 (22). – S. 111–113.

33. Koloniari M, Fassoulis K. Knowledge Management Perceptions in Academic Libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2017; 43 (2): 135–42.

34. Zubov Yu. S. Bibliografiya i hudozhestvennoe razvitie lichnosti. – Moskva : Kniga, 1979. – 144 s.