Combining classification systems and building the array of keyworks for defining the space of microbiological knowledge

Using various classifiers, which are thought to facilitate analytical work through structuring subject areas, in fact impedes this work. The authors present the method of combining several classification systems, namely the State Rubricator of Sci-tech Information (SRNTI); and RAS VINITI’s Rubricator of Disciplines; Universal Decimal Classification (UDC); International Patent Classification (IPC). The combination of these classification systems solves the fundamental problem which is to obtain the most detailed understanding of any scientific problem. The solution of this problem enables to determine search boundaries, filter out insignificant and irrelevant information on the subject (in this case – Microbiology). In their study, the authors selected the author's keywords and phrases. On the basis of the arrays of author’s keywords and phrases, an essential harmonized list of keywords and phrases for the basic Microbiology local rubricator was designed. Further, the selected keywords and phrases will serve as the foundation for building the ontological model of the discipline, which will enable computerized ontology building. The Microbiology draft rubricator developed by the authors comprises a three-level hierarchy. In particular, the first level is based on the classical concept of classification systems. Rubricator in Microbiology is developed on the basis of VINITI RAS classification of disciplines through the detailing method.

information space, classification systems, terms, Microbiology, ontology of the subject area

1. Antopolskiy A. B., Efremenko D. V. K voprosu o edinom elektronnom prostranstve znaniy // Vestn. Ros. akad. nauk. – 2018. – T. 88. – № 2. – S. 163–170.

2. Antopolskiy A. B., Kalenov N. E., Serebryakov V. A., Sotneykov A. N. Tochka zreniya o edinom tsifrovom prostranstve nauchnyh znaniy // Tam zhe. – 2019. – T. 89. – № 7. – S. 728–734.

3. Tsvetkova V. A., Mohnacheva Yu. V., Harybina T. N., Beskaravaynaya E. V., Mitroshin I. A. Prostranstvo znaniy: podhody k izvlecheniyu znaniy iz nauchnyh tekstov // Inform. resursy Rossii. – 2019. – № 2 (168). – S. 31–34.

4. Bekon F. Sochineniya: V 2 t. T. 1. – 1977. – 567 s.; T. 2. – 1978. – 575 s. – Moskva : Mysl.

5. Dekart R. Sochineniya: V 2 t. T. 1. – 1989. – 656 s.; T. 2. – 1989. – 654 s. – Moskva : Mysl.

6. Lokk Dzh. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya: V 2 t. T. 1. – Moskva : Sotsekgiz, 1960. – 713 s.

7. Gegel G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskih nauk. T. 1. – 1971. – 452 s.; T. 2. – 1975. – 693 s.; T. 3. – 1977. – 471 s. – Moskva : Mysl.

8. Engels F. Dialektika prirody. – Moskva : Politizdat, 1987. – 349 s.

9. Pirs Ch. S. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya / per. s angl.: K. Golubovich, K. Chuhrukidze, T. Dmitriev. – Moskva : Logos, 2000. – 448 s.

10. Kedrov B. M. Klassifikatsiya nauk. Kn. 1. Engels i ego predshestvenniki. – Moskva : Izd. VPSh i AON, 1961. – 472 s.

11. Kedrov B. M. Klassifikatsiya nauk. Kn. 2. Ot Lenina do nashih dney. – Moskva : Mysl, 1965. – 543 s.

12. Trusova Yu. O., Beloozerov V. N. Predstavlenie klassifikatsionnyh sistem v vide ontologiy. Obzor // Nauch.-tehn. inform. Ser. 1. Org. i metodika inform. raboty. – 2015. – № 11. – S. 34–38.

13. Dobrov B. V., Lukashevich N. V. Leengvisticheskaya ontologiya po estestvennym naukam i tehnologiyam dlya prilozheniy v sfere informatsionnogo poiska // Uchenye zap. Kazan. un-ta. Fiz.-mat. nauki. – 2007. – T. 149. – № 2. – S. 49–72.

14. Ontologii i tezaurusy: modeli, instrumenty, prilozheniya : ucheb. posobie / B. V. Dobrov, V. V. Iva¬nov, N. V. Lukashevich, V. D. Solovev. – Moskva, 2012. – 173 s.

15. NABS – Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparison of Scientific Programmes and Budgets. European Commission. – Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1994.

16. Handbok for FoU-statistik. Matning av resurver for Forsknings-och-utvecklingsverksamhet. – Stockholm : NORDFORSK, 1974.

17. Sukiasyan E. R. Klassifikatsiya Biblioteki Kongressa SSHA // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. – 1998. – № 5. – S. 59–69.

18. Gilyarevskmy R. S., Shapkin A. V., Beloozerov V. N. Rubrikator kak instrument informatsionnoy navigatsii. – Sankt-Peterburg : Professiya, 2008. – 352 s.

19. Gilyarevskiy R. S. O sferah primeneniya rubrikatora // Nauch.-tehn. inform. Ser. 1. Org. i metodika inform. raboty. – 1982. – № 1. – S. 22–26.

20. Beloozerov V. N., Malahov A. A., Rozina I. A. Primenenie GRNTI v zadachah upravleniya naukoy i nauchno-tehnicheskoy ekspertizy // NTI-99. Materialy konf. – Moskva : VINITI, 1999. – S. 44–50.

21. Tablitsy sootvetstviya mezhdu Rubrikatorom Mezhdunarodnoy sistemy nauchnoy i tehnicheskoy informatsii i Mezhdunarodnoy patentnoy klassifikatsiey. – Moskva : MTSNTI, TPO «Poisk», 1985.

22. Gosudarstvennyy rubrikator nauchno-tehnicheskoy informatsii (Rubrikator GRNTI). Izd. pyatoe. – Moskva, 2001.

23. Gosudarstvennyy rubrikator nauchno-tehnicheskoy informatsii. – Moskva : VINITI, 2001. – 391 s.

24. Universalnaya desyatichnaya klassifikatsiya. Polnoe chetvertoe izd. na rus. yazyke. T. 1–10. – Moskva : VINITI, 2001.

25. Antopolskiy A. B., Beloozerov V. N., Kalenov N. E., Markarova T. S. O razvitii terminologicheskoy bazy dannyh v vide kompleksa otraslevyh informatsionno-poiskovyh tezaurusov // Inform. resursy Rossii, 2018. – № 5 (165). – S. 22–30.