Transforming scientific libraries within the concept of bibliography as surrogate knowledge .
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-1-45-59
Abstract
The author examines the concept of the bibliography as surrogate knowledge. The concept was developed by Prof. Yury Zubov (1924–2006), Dr. Sc. (Pedagogy), a prominent Soviet and Russian bibliographer, researcher, culturologist, in the late 1970s – early 1980s. The fundamentals of the concept are revealed and characterized, namely: 1) formalizing functions of bibliography that enable to structurize and compress the knowledge and knowledge information which makes an imperative for humans’ thinking limited with the brain capacity, time and spatial extent; 2) the concept logical justification based on the study of scientific knowledge genesis, beginning in the antiquity (encyclopedism – differentiation – integration). The scholar proved that bibliography development was determined by the scientific knowledge genesis and its content structure. The essential qualities of bibliography (formalizing qualities and genetic affinity with science and scientific knowledge) determine the concept’s prognostic character. The modern bibliographic activities have been coopting the features of science and scientific knowledge development, namely transdisciplinarity and postnonclassic science rationality norms. The concept key role in the development of scientific libraries in the circumstances of their transforming activities is substantiated.
Keywords
bibliography,
surrogate knowledge,
Yury S. Zubov,
scientific library,
scientific knowledge,
transdisciplinarity,
science rationality
Supporting agencies: The paper is prepared through the sponsorship of the RF Government (Decree № 211 of March 16, 2013, Agreement № 02.А03.21.0011).
About the Author
L. V. Astakhova
South Ural State University
Russian Federation
Lyudmila V. Astakhova, Dr. Sc. (Pedagogy), Professor, Information Protection Chair Chelyabinsk
Russian Federation
Lyudmila V. Astakhova, Dr. Sc. (Pedagogy), Professor, Information Protection Chair Chelyabinsk
References
1. Zubov Yu. S. Bibliografiya kak sistema svernutogo znaniya // Teoretiko-metodolog. problemy sovrem. sovet. bibliografovedeniya : mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. – Moskva, 1981. – S. 23–40.
2. Lebedeva L. N. Tendentsiya formalizatsii kultury // O-vo: filosofiya, istoriya, kultura. – 2016. – № 9 [Elektronnyy resurs].
3. Petьov V. A., Pohilo A. D., Gubanova M. A. Sotsiokulturnye formoobrazovaniya: filosofskiy aspekt // Tam zhe. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 34–38.
4. Fokeev V. A. Priroda bibliograficheskogo znaniya. – Moskva : Kniga, 1995. – 351 s.
5. Slyadneva N. A. Bibliografiya v sisteme Universuma chelovecheskoy deyatelnosti: Opyt sistemno-deyatelnostnogo analiza. – Moskva : Izd-vo MGIK, 1993. – 226 s.
6. Astahova L. V. Bibliografiya kak nauchnyy fenomen. – Moskva : Izd-vo MGUK, 1997. – 338 s.
7. Kuznetsova T. Ya. Bibliograficheskoe znanie kak instrument i raznovidnost nauchnogo poznaniya // Rol bibliogr. v inform. obespechenii istor. nauki : sb. st. / avt.-sost. E. A. Vorontsova ; otv. red.: M. D. Afanasev, N. K. Lelikova, A. Yu. Samarin. – Moskva, 2018. – S. 75–80.
8. Kartashova A. A. Transformatsiya i deformatsiya nauchnogo znaniya v svyazi s rasshireniem nauchnyh podhodov i metodov // Ros. gumanitar. zhurn. – 2015. – T. 4. – № 5. – S. 347–357.
9. Plohinova M. B., Glotova V. V. O tendentsiyah razvitiya sovremennogo nauchnogo znaniya // Vestn. Voronezh. gos. tehn. un-ta. – 2010. – T. 6. – № 2. – S. 40–42.
10. Nikitina E. A. Poznanie. Soznanie. Bessoznatelnoe. – Moskva : Leebrokom, 2011. – 234 s.
11. Romanovskaya T. B. Obektivnost nauki i chelovecheskaya subektivnost, ili V chem sostoit chelovecheskoe izmerenie nauki. – Moskva : Editorial URSS, 2001. – 208 s.
12. Romanovskaya T. B. Ratsionalnoe obosnovanie vnenauchnogo // Vopr. filos. – 1994. – № 9. – S. 23–26.
13. Pokotylo M. V. Nauchnye kommunikatsii: ot populyarizatsii znaniy k nauchnomu PR // Reklama i svyazi s obshchestvennostyu: traditsii i innovatsii. – 2018. – S. 48–58.
14. Sci Ani Science Animated. – URL: https://sciani.com/
15. Astahova L. V. Vizualizatsiya informatsionnyh resursov v usloviyah tsifrovizatsii sfery poznaniya (Obzor) // NTI. Ser. 1. Org. i metodika inform. raboty. – 2019. – № 2. – S. 1–9.
16. Shrayberg Ya. L. V poiskah obektivnosti. «Karta nauki vedet v biblioteku» // Poisk. – 2014. – № 7.
17. Shrayberg Ya. L. Vremya peremen: globalnye informatsionnye trendy i perspektivy. Ezhegodnyy doklad Vtorogo mezhdunarodnogo professionalnogo foruma «Crimea–2016» // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. – 2016. – № 9. – S. 3–54.
18. Hutchinson A. Science Libraries in the Self-Service Age Developing New Services, Targeting New Users. – 2019. – 160 p. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-04547-6
19. Blyumenau D. I. Problemy svertyvaniya nauchnoy informatsii. – Leningrad : Nauka: Leningr. otd-nie, 1982. – 166 s.
20. Galyavieva M. S. O novoy roli nauchnyh bibliotek v sovremennoy informatsionnoy srede nauchnoy kommunikatsii // Vestn. KazGUKI. – 2014. – № 1 [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-novoy-roli-nauchnyh-bibliotek-v-sovremennoy-informatsionnoy-srede-nauchnoy-kommunikatsii
21. Reves Zh. Novyy vzglyad na nauku: obzor menyayushchihsya roley nauchnyh bibliotek // Mezhdunar. forum po inform. – 2018. – T. 43. – № 2. – S. 15–24.
22. Koloniari M., Fassoulis K. Knowledge Management Perceptions in Academic Libraries // The Journal of Academic Librarianship. – 2017. – Vol. 43. – Iss. 2. – P. 135–142.
23. Lavrik O. L., Pleshakova M. A., Kalyuzhnaya T. A. Informatsionno-analiticheskie produkty v nauchnyh bibliotekah dlya informatsionnogo obespecheniya nauchno-issledovatelskoy raboty // Vestn. Tom. gos. un-ta. Kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. – 2018. – № 32. – S. 186–201.
24. Gordukalova G. F. Smyslovoy analiz tekstov // Bibliosfera. – 2010. – № 1. – S. 23–27.
25. Feldman S. The future of the MLIS: imparting enduring values with changing instruction models // American Libraries. – 2015. – № 46 (11/12). – P. 5.
Review
For citations:
Astakhova L.V. Transforming scientific libraries within the concept of bibliography as surrogate knowledge . Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2020;(1):45-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-1-45-59
Views:
686
Email this article 