Open access repositories: Functions and trends
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-9-121-142
Abstract
Open access repositories are an integral part of open science infrastructure that ensures the accessibility and findability of research results. This article is based on the analysis of the various types of repositories. The authors attempted to identify main functions of these platforms, their features and development trends. The sample includes 11 repositories, both institutional and thematic projects, and also general-purpose platforms. The main function of repositories is the storage of publications, although over time the role of these services as the publication priority registrators is increasing. Projects typically feature pre-moderation procedures, as well as a rather careful attitude to the metadata and its accuracy. Only one repository charges publication fee, their revenue come from sponsorship funds, donations, advertising, additional paid services (in various combinations). The possibilities of social interaction as a rule are quite limited: neither reviewing, nor even commenting are built-in functions of the reviewed projects. Collective work on the manuscript is also impossible. The trends of repositories future development are the diversification of formats and types of works exchanged by scientists, as well as the increasing of the importance of non-profit projects for the scientific communication infrastructure.
About the Authors
I. I. Zassoursky
M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan I. Zassoursky – Cand. Sc. (Philology), Head, Chair of New Media and Communication Theory, Faculty of Journalism
Moscow
D. V. Sokolova
M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Darya V. Sokolova – Cand. Sc. (Philology), Senior Lecturer, Chair of New Media and Communication Theory, Faculty of Journalism
Moscow
N. D. Trishchenko
M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nataliia D. Trishchenko – Cand. Sc. (Philology), Editor, Chair of New Media and Communication Theory, Faculty of Journalism
Moscow
References
1. Future of Scholarly Publishing and Scholarly Communication: Report of the Expert Group to the European Commission. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019. – Р. 16. – DOI: 10.2777/836532.
2. Zasurskiy I. I., Trishchenko N. D. Infrastruktura otkrytoy nauki v Rossii i mire // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 84–100. – URL: https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2019-4-84-100.
3. Semyachkin D. A., Sergeev M., Kislyak E. Vozmozhnye puti razvitiya Otkrytoy nauki v Rossii // Nauch. periodika: problemy i resheniya. – № 2. – 2015. – S. 89–94.
4. Elektronnye biblioteki v Rossii. Tekushchiy status i perspektivy razvitiya / K. L. Zuykina, D. V. Sokolova, A. V. Skalaban. — Moskva : Vash format, 2017. – 120 s.
5. Semyachkin D. A. Otkrytyy dostup k nauke: mify i realnost // Univ. kn. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 82–84.
6. Statistics for the 2562 publishers in the RoMEO database / Sherpa/Romeo [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/statistics.php?la=en&fIDnum=%7C&mode=simple.
7. Trishchenko N. D. Transformatsiya sistemy nauchnoy kommunikatsii pod vliyaniem otkrytogo dostupa: tekushchiy status, predposylki peremen, effekty i perspektivy razvitiya // Nauch.-tehn. inform. Ser. 1. Org. i metodika inform. raboty. – 2019. – № 4. – C. 23–34.
8. Piwowar H., Priem J., Larivière V., Alperin J., Matthias L., Norlander B., Farley A., West J., Haustein S. (2017). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 6: e4375. – URL: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.837902.
9. Makeenko M. I., Trishchenko N. D. Vliyanie otkrytogo dostupa na tsitiruemost i na alternativnye metriki nauchnyh statey po media i kommunikatsii // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 10. Zhurnalistika. – 2018. – № 5. – S. 3–26. – DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.5.2018.326.
10. Elías Tzoc (2016). Institutional repository software platforms at undergraduate libraries in the United States, College & Undergraduate Libraries. – 23:2. – 184–192. – DOI: 10.1080/10691316.2014.959230.
11. Andrew Wesolek, Jan Comfort & Lisa Bodenheimer (2015). Collaborate to Innovate: Expanding Access to Faculty Patents through the Institutional Repository and the Library Catalog, Collection Management. – 40:4. – 219–235. – DOI: 10.1080/01462679.2015.1093986.
12. Pentti Vattulainen (2004). National repository initiatives in Europe, Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services. – 28:1. – 39–50. – DOI: 10.1080/14649055.2004.10765971.
13. Joanne Carroll (2015). Developing a Code of Ethics for the Digital Repository of Ireland, New Review of Information Networking. – 20:1-2. – 48–52. – DOI: 10.1080/13614576.2015.1114838.
14. Singh P. Open access repositories in India: Characteristics and future potential // IFLA Journal. – 2016. – № 42 (1). – С. 16–24. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035215610131.
15. Elahi M. H., & Mezbah-ul-Islam M. Open access repositories of Bangladesh: An analysis of the present status // IFLA Journal. – № 44 (2). – С. 132–142. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035218763952.
16. Bossaller J., & Atiso K. Sharing science: The state of institutional repositories in Ghana // IFLA Journal. – 2015. – № 41 (1). – С. 25–39. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035214561582.
17. Mamtora J., Yang T., & Singh D. Open access repositories in the Asia–Oceania region: Experiences and guidelines from three academic institutions // IFLA Journal. – 2015. – № 41 (2). – С. 162–176. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035215582219.
18. Moskovkin V. M. Dvizhenie otkrytogo dostupa: vyzovy dlya Rossii // Nauch. izdanie mezhdunar. urovnya – 2017: mirovaya praktika podgotovki i prodvizheniya publikatsiy : materialy 6-y Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Moskva, 18–21 apr. 2017 g. – S. 82–89.
19. Björk B.–C. (2014). Open Access Subject Repositories. J Assn Inf Sci Tec. – 65: 698–706. – DOI: 10.1002/asi.23021.
20. Trishchenko N. D. Otkrytyy dostup k nauke: analiz preimushchestv i puti perehoda k novoy modeli obmena znaniyami. – Moskva : Assotsiatsiya internet-izdateley; Ekaterinburg : Kabinetnyy uchenyy, 2017. – 198 s.
21. Rozhdestvenskaya M. Yu. Repozitoriy kak realizatsiya idey otkrytogo dostupa k nauchnym publikatsiyam: podhod k klassifikatsii // Bibliosfera. – 2015. – № 2. – S. 86–94.
22. Shrayberg Ya. L. Otkrytyy dostup: mirovye tendentsii i otechestvennye realii // Nauch. b-ki v inform. o-ve: harakter deyatelnosti i puti razvitiya. – Kazan : Meditsina, 2016. – S. 15–21.
23. Larivière V., Sugimoto C.R., Macaluso B., Milojević S., Cronin M., Thelwall M. (2014). arXiv E–prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships. The Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. – P. 1157–1169. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23044.
Review
For citations:
Zassoursky I.I., Sokolova D.V., Trishchenko N.D. Open access repositories: Functions and trends. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2020;1(9):121-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-9-121-142
Views:
2306
Email this article 