Organizing thematic search in open archive system
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-10-105-118
Abstract
Problems of search organization in open archive system are specified and analyzed. The experience of thematic search in digital resources is generalized. The approaches to organizing open archive search interface oriented toward untrained and trained users are characterized. The pros and cons of single search window are discussed. Vectors to improve search instruments and performance are defined. The rubricator version to support thematic search adaptation is proposed. The choice of UDC as the rubricator foundation is substantiated provided that its correspondence with the State Rubricator of Scitech information and Library Bibliographic Classification is set up. The fragment of the suggested rubricator is given as an example. The main purpose of the analysis is to summarize on the problems related to thematic search and to propose approaches to design optimum close-knit rubricator, and to identify its application possibilities.
Keywords
About the Author
E. M. ZaitsevaRussian Federation
Ekaterina M. Zaitseva – Cand. Sc. (Philology), Leading Researcher, Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology; Associate Professor, Department for Electronic Libraries and Scientometric Studies, Moscow State Linguistic University.
Moscow.
References
1. Goncharov M. V., Kolosov K. A. Razrabotka sistemy otkrytogo arhiva GPNTB Rossii // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. – 2018. – № 12. – S. 42–48.
2. Skaruk G. A. Komfortnost kak kriteriy otsenki kachestva elektronnogo kataloga // Trudy GPNTB SO RAN. – Vyp. 13. – T. 2. – Novosibirsk, 2018. – S. 177–184.
3. Breeding M. Next-Generation Library Catalogs. Chapter 1: Introduction // Library Technology Reports. – 2007. – Vol. 43. – № 4. – P. 5–14. – URL: https://librarytechnology.org/document/18344.
4. Yang Sh. Q., Hofmann M. A. The Next Generation Library Catalog: A Comparative Study of the OPACs of Koha, Evergreen and Voyager // Information Technology and Libraries. – 2010. – September. – P. 141–150. – URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275297017_The_Next_Generation_Library_Catalog_A_Comparative_Study_of_the_OPACs_of_Koha_Evergreen_and_Voyager/fulltext/572cc19208aee02297597a6a/275297017_The_Next_Generation_Library_Catalog_A_Comparative_Study_of_the_OPACs_of_Koha_Evergreen_and_Voyager.pdf?origin=publication_detail.
5. Perceptions of Libraries, 2010. Context and Community: A Report to the OCLC Membership. – Dublin, Ohio : OCLC, 2010. – URL: https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/2010perceptions/2010perceptions_all_singlepage.pdf.
6. Skaruk G. A. «Nepodgotovlennyy polzovatel» elektronnogo kataloga: kto on? // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. – 2009. – № 7. – S. 12–20.
7. Skaruk G. A. Chitatelskiy poisk v elektronnom kataloge: itogi analiza poiskovoy statistiki GPNTB SO RAN // Tam zhe. – 2017. – № 12. – S. 63–72.
8. Sukiasyan E. R. Za chto chitateli lyubili sistematicheskiy katalog? // Tam zhe. – 2014. – № 5. – S. 45–51.
9. Gendina N. I. Leengvisticheskie sredstva bibliotechno-informatsionnyh tehnologiy. – Sankt-Peterburg : Professiya, 2015. – ISBN 978-5-904757-73-1.
10. Antopolskiy A. B. Lingvisticheskoe obespechenie elektronnyh bibliotek. – Moskva : Informregistr, 2003. – ISBN 5-900737-05-1.
11. Zaytseva E. M. Lingvisticheskoe obespechenie avtomatizirovannyh bibliotechno-informatsionnyh sistem: sovremennye trebovaniya i napravleniya razvitiya // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. – 2000. – № 3. – S. 54–57.
12. Skaruk G. A., Zharikova L. A., Stukalova A. A. Poiskovye yazyki elektronnyh katalogov. – Novosibirsk : GPNTB SO RAN, 2009. – ISBN 978-5-94560-181-9.
13. Lavrenova O. A. Problemy formirovaniya lingvisticheskogo obespecheniya el-ektronnyh katalogov i elektronnyh bibliotek // Leengvisticheskoe obespechenie informatsionnyh resursov bibliotek, muzeev, arhivov i drugih uchrezhdeniy kultury : materialy IV nauch.-prakt. seminara «Elektronnye resursy bibliotek», 30–31 okt. 2008 g., Sankt-Peterburg. – Sankt-Peterburg, 2008. – S. 8–18.
14. Analitiko-sinteticheskaya pererabotka informatsii / N. I. Gendina [i dr.] ; nauch. red. A. V. Sokolov. – Sankt-Peterburg : Professiya, 2017.
15. Revised Field of Science and Technology (FOS) Classification // Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development : ofitsialnyy sayt. – URL: http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/38235147.pdf.
16. Ob utverzhdenii nomenklatury nauchnyh spetsialnostey, po kotorym prisuzhdayutsya uchenye stepeni (s izmeneniyami na 23 marta 2018 g.) // Elektronnyy fond pravovoy i normativno-tehnicheskoy dokumentatsii. – URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/542610966.
Review
For citations:
Zaitseva E.M. Organizing thematic search in open archive system. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2020;(10):105-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-10-105-118