Balancing interests of authors and broad public
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2021-11-65-84
Abstract
The authors investigate into the rules contained in the international treaties, Russian existing laws and judicial routine related to exclusiveness of authors’ rights. The character of social changes in the digital era were specified. Several types of legal relations remain traditional, however in today’s information society has to revise existing laws in which authors rights dominate over information user interests. At the same time, the authors re underprotected from piracy. Legislators have to prioritize in the first place who and from whom must be protected in the information society: the authros from pirates, intellectual property from plagiarism, or the users from actualaccessible information. Secondly, the rights of new knowledge have to be managed and efficient ways to righ t-ful transfer of accumulated knowledge to users have to be found. Implementation of information technologies into libraries and access to digital information resources change radically the quality of library services. The authors challenged themselves with attracting attention to the problems of information society in Russia.
About the Authors
D. M. Tsukerblat
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry M. Tsukerblat – Cand. Sc. (Pedagogy), Leading Researcher,
Department for Research and Instructional Work
Novosibirsk
A. I. Markeev
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr I. Markeev – Cand. Sc. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Entrepreneurial Law
Novosibirsk
References
1. Bernskaya konventsiya ob ohrane literaturnyh i hudozhestvennyh proizvedeniy // Intellektualnaya sobstvennost : v 2 t. T. 1. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava / sost. i komment. I. V. Popova; pod red. Chigira V. F. – Minsk : Amalfeya, 1997. – S. 68–138.
2. Tsukerblat D. M. Rezhimy avtorskogo prava v informatsionno-bibliotechnoy sfere / I. Yu. Krasinikova // Inform. o-vo. – 2019. – № 4/5. – S. 96–104.
3. Dogovor VOIS po avtorskomu pravu. Mezhdunarodnyy dogovor ot 20 dekabrya 1996 g. – URL: http://www.consultant.ru, svobodnyy iz lokalnoy seti Sib. in-ta upravleniya RANHiGS (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021). – Zagl. c ekrana.
4. Dobrosovestnoe ispolzovanie. – URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021).
5. Delo Campbell protiv Acuff-RoseMusic, Inc., 510 U.S/ 569, 575 (1994). – URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc. (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021).
6. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtorskoe pravo. Prava, smezhnye s avtorskimi. Postateynyy kommentariy k glavam 69–71 / pod red. P. V. Krasheninnikova. – Moskva : Statut, 2014.
7. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Ch. 4: Feder. zakon ot 18.12.2006 g. № 230-FZ : [red. ot 11.06.2021] // Ros. gaz. – 2006. – 22 dek.
8. Lakizo I. G. Resursy otkrytogo dostupa kak obekt formirovaniya fondov akademicheskih bibliotek. (Opyt GPNTB SO RAN) / N. I. Podkorytova, L. V. Bosina // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. – 2019. – № 5. – S. 78–93.
9. Dovgan E. F. Prava cheloveka v epohu informatsionnyh tehnologiy // Vestn. un-ta im. O. E. Kutafina. – 2018. – № 5. – S. 109–125.
10. Mezhdunarodnyy pakt ob ekonomicheskih i kulturnyh pravah. – URL: http://www.consultant.ru, svobodnyy iz lokalnoy seti Sib. in-ta upravleniya RANHiGS (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021). – Zagl. c ekrana.
11. Algoritmy i avtomatizatsiya: novye rukovodyashchie printsipy po preduprezhdeniyu narusheniy avtorskih prav. – URL: https://www.coe.int/ru/web/portal/-/algorithms-and-automation-new-guidelines-to-prevent-human-rights-breaches (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021). – Zagl. c ekrana; sm. takzhe: Algoritmy obrabotki dannyh: pomoshchniki ili diktatory? // Ros. gaz. – 2020. – 08 okt.
12. Ogneva E. N. Potrebitelskie trebovaniya k elektronnym informatsionnym resursam kak osnova otsenki ih kachestva // Tr. GPNTB SO RAN : nauch.-prakt. zhurn. – 2019. – № 2 (2). – S. 40–43.
13. Ivanova D. V. Isklyucheniya i ogranicheniya avtorskogo prava dlya bibliotek: sovremennoe sostoyanie // B-ka kak fenomen kultury: materialy III Mezhdunar. kongressa (Minsk, 2015). Chtenie i inform. kultura v sovrem. o-ve. – Minsk, 2015. – S. 47–52.
14. Makarov R. A. Instrumenty tsifrovoy ekonomiki v avtorskom prave i izdatelskom dele // Univ. kn. – 2018. – № 10. – S. 78–80.
15. Gulyaeva N. S. Otkrytaya litsenziya – instrument dlya balansa v sfere avtorskogo prava // Pravo i inform.: voprosy teorii i praktiki : sb. materialov mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. – Sankt-Peterburg, 2015. – S. 112–118.
16. Petrenko E. G. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya zashchita avtorskih prav v seti Internet / O. V. Novikova // Leningr. yurid. zhurn. – 2016. – № 3. – S. 108–116.
17. Kuzevanov A. I. Obshchaya harakteristika mehanizma ohrany i zashchity obektov avtorskih i smezhnyh prav v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Intellektual. sobstvennost. Avtor. pravo i smezh. prava. – 2016. – № 7. – S. 31–44.
18. Izmaylova E. Kollektivnoe upravlenie avtorskimi i smezhnymi pravami v Evraziyskom ekonomicheskom soyuze // Tam zhe. – 2018. – № 9. – S. 5–18.
19. Grazhdanskiy protsessualnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14.11.2002 g. № 138-FZ (red. ot 01.07.2021) // Ros. gaz. – 2002. – 20 noyab.
20. Trishchenko N. Otkrytaya biblioteka dlya tsifrovoy ekonomiki // Univ. kn. – 2018. – URL: http://www.unkniga.ru/biblioteki/bibdelo/8337-otkrytaya-biblioteka-dlya-tsifrovoyekonomiki.html (data obrashcheniya: 05.06.2021). – Zagl. c ekrana.
21. Zhukov E. A. Problemy regulirovaniya deyatelnosti publichnyh bibliotek v sfere avtorskogo prava // Bibliosfera. – 2015. – № 4. – S. 61–64.
22. Avtorskoe pravo v tsifrovoy srede: reaktsiya EUROPEANA na rekomendatsii Evrosoyuza / per. E. I. Ziminoy // Bibl. delo za rubezhom: sb. analit. i sprav. materialov. – Moskva : Pashkov dom, 2015. – S. 96–124.
23. Dresher Yu. N. Upravlenie znaniyami v protsessah obespecheniya kachestva uslug bibliotechno-informatsionnyh tsentrov : monogr. / T. I. Klyuchenko, O. N. Oleynik. – Moskva : VINITI, 2015. – 206 s.
24. Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Novosibirskoy oblasti po delu A45-19260/2008 ot 10.02.2009 g. – URL: https://ras.arbitr.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021 g.).
25. Krupnuyu internet-biblioteku zakryli po trebovaniyu pravoobladateley. – URL: https//lenta.ru\news\2012\02\16\nobooks\ (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021).
26. Direktiva 2001/29/EC. – URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B0_2001/29/EC (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2021).
27. Sumenkov S. Yu. Ogranicheniya v prave i isklyucheniya v prave: aspekty sootnosheniya // Yurid. tehnika. – 2018. – № 12. – S. 330.
28. Malysheva G. A. O sotsialno-politicheskih vyzovah i riskah tsifrovizatsii rossiyskogo obshchestva // Vlast. – 2018. – № 01. – S. 41.
Review
For citations:
Tsukerblat D.M., Markeev A.I. Balancing interests of authors and broad public. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2021;(11):65-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2021-11-65-84
Views:
421
Email this article 