The methods and forms of e-learning and distance educational technologies: Blended learning 2.0
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-2-91-108
Abstract
Several findings of the study of students’ attitude toward methods and forms of e-learning and distance educational technologies, are discussed. The surveyed area of studies is “library and information activities”. In May, 2021, the author conducted the survey at educational institutions of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. The master program students demonstrated the higher level of engagement working with electronic and online learning technologies than the undergraduates. The author explains this with the fact that postgraduate students are offered more time for their independent work, moreover, they master the universal competence – “the ability of self-organization and self-education”. The author establishes that big (and possibly, excessive) number of information systems and mass media was used for the final and midterm assessment and knowledge transfer using distance learning technologies. In the final part of the study, the author demonstrates that the vast majority of respondents (75.7% bachelors and 81.5% masters) think it necessary to apply e-learning and online technologies in education. The study enables to evaluate the modern trends of continuing library and information education and to specify challenges of its development in the circumstances of digital transformation of education and culture.
About the Author
R. R. MukhametshinRussian Federation
Ramis R. Mukhametshin – Head, Information and Editorial Department, A. Kh. Khalikov Institute of Archaeology of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences; postgraduate, The Department of library and the information activity and the intellectual systems, Kazan State Institute of Culture
Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan
References
1. Federalnyy zakon ot 29 dekabrya 2012 g. № 273-FZ «Ob obrazovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (s izmeneniyami ot 06.02.2020 g.) [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.06.2021 г.).
2. Prikaz Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF ot 23 avgusta 2017 g. № 816 «Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka primeneniya organizatsiyami, osushchestvlyayushchimi obrazovatelnuyu deyatelnost, elektronnogo obucheniya, distantsionnyh obrazovatelnyh tehnologiy pri realizatsii obrazovatelnyh programm» [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://base.garant.ru/71770012/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.06.2021).
3. Strekalova N. B. Riski vnedreniya tsifrovyh tehnologiy v obrazovanie / N. B. Strekalova // Vestneyk Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriya, pedagogika, filologiya. 2019. T. 25. № 2. S. 84–88. https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2019-25-2-84-88.
4. Neobhodimost perehoda na distantsionnyy format obucheniya: rezultaty issledovaniya / M. V. Polevaya, S. A. Polevoy, S. M. Buyanova [i dr.] // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2020. № 9. S. 194–209. https://doi.org/10.46486/0234-4505-2020-9-194-209.
5. Savich L. E. O vozmozhnostyah ispolzovaniya tehnologiy elektronnogo i distantsionnogo obucheniya v nepreryvnom sotsiokulturnom obrazovanii / L. E. Savich, N. A. Shaytanova, R. R. Muhametshin // Sotsialno-kulturnaya deyatelnost: vektory issledovatelskih i prakticheskih perspektiv: materialy Mezhdunar. elektron. nauch.-prakt. konf., Kazan, 18 maya 2018 g. / pod nauch. red. P. P. Terehova. Kazan : Brig, 2018. S. 560–565.
6. Huang R. H., Liu D. J., Guo J., Yang J. F., Zhao J. H., Wei X. F., Knyazeva S., Li M., Zhuang R. X., Looi C. K., & Chang T. W. (2020). Guidance on Flexible Learning during Campus Closures: Ensuring course quality of higher education in COVID-19 outbreak. Beijing : Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University.
7. Bobrovich T. A. Metodicheskaya kompetentnost prepodavatelya professionalnoy shkoly v kontekste psihologo-pedagogicheskoy perepodgotovki i povysheniya kvalifikatsii / T. A. Bobrovich // Teoriya i metodika professionalnogo obrazovaniya. 2014. T. 1. № 1–1. S. 213–218.
8. Stukalenko N. M. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie problemy primeneniya kompyuternyh tehnologiy v obrazovanii / N. M. Stukalenko, O. A. Dmitrieva // Uchebnyy eksperiment v obrazovanii. 2011. № 2. S. 22A–26.
9. UNESCO (2020) COVID-19 and Higher education: today and tomorrow [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/COVID-19-EN-130520.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.06.2021).
10. IAU (2020) The Impact of COVID-19 on Higher Education around the World [El-ektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf (date of access: 02.06.2021).
11. Sovremennaya analitika obrazovaniya. Shtorm pervyh nedel: kak vysshee obrazovanie shagnulo v realnost pandemii. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://ioe.hse.ru/data/2020/05/26/1551527214/%D0%A1%D0%90%D0%9E%206(36)_%D1%8D%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.07.2020).
12. Svodnyy analiticheskiy otchet «Analiz rynka vysshego obrazovaniya po napravleniyu „Bibliotechno-informatsionnaya deyatelnost“: predlozhenie, kontent programm, klyuchevye kompetentsii». URL: http://xn--80aacacvtbthqmh0dxl.xn--p1ai/assets/files/documents/analiz-rynka-vysshego-obrazovaniya-po-napravleniyu-bid.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.06.2021).
Review
For citations:
Mukhametshin R.R. The methods and forms of e-learning and distance educational technologies: Blended learning 2.0. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2022;(2):91-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-2-91-108