The libraries and Open Science: vectors of interaction
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-3-105-126
Abstract
The need to define the role of libraries in developing open science information ecosystem is substantiated by the growing number of open access (OA) publications and transformation of researchers’ digital literacy. The key library vectors of activities depend upon the open science concept (pragmatic, infrastructural, civil, democratic, or validating) and supporting collaborative scientific activities, access to data and information, advocating open science initiatives, OA resources management, including institutional repositories, library catalogs, new analytical products, content-based learning, etc. The examples of introducing and promoting OA paradigm in library services are given. The key librarian competences of OA resources acquisition, dissemination, exchange and promotion of related services are defined. The competences comprise knowledge of open science regulations, principles and technologies of OA resource organization, their types and metadata types. With this knowledge the librarians are fit for research process, rendering research findings to meet the OA standards, and teaching OA skills. Based on their findings, the author argues that the libraries are able to build their value on the market of information resources, and to support institutional studies and open science schools.
About the Author
N. S. Redkina
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalya S. Redkina – Dr. Sc. (Pedagogy), Deputy Director for Research
Novosibirsk
References
1. Budapest Open Access Initiative. URL: https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
2. Open innovation, open science, open to the world – a vision for Europe. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-singlemarket/en/news/open-innovation-open-science-open-world-vision-europe (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
3. Horizon 2020: programme–guidelines to the rules on open access to scientific publications and open access to research data in Horizon 2020. 2017. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20180414170704/http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
4. Kosyakov D. V. Rossiyskaya nauka v otkrytom dostupe: sostoyanie i tendentsii / D. V. Kosyakov // Nauka, tehnologii i informatsiya v bibliotekah (Libway–2019): sbornik tezisov dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Novosibirsk, 2019. S. 107-110.
5. Chigisheva O. P. Tsifrovaya gramotnost issledovatelya v usloviyah otkrytoy nauki / O. P. Chigisheva // Azimut nauchnyh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psihologiya. 2018. T. 7. № 4 (25). S. 241–244.
6. Trishchenko N. D. Transformatsiya sistemy nauchnoy kommunikatsii pod vliyaniem otkrytogo dostupa: tekushchiy status, predposylki peremen, effekty i perspektivy razvitiya / N. D. Trishchenko // Nauchno-tehnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoy raboty. 2019. № 4. S. 23–34.
7. Leetvinova N. N., Razumova I. K. Otnoshenie rossiyskogo nauchnogo soobshchestva k otkrytomu dostupu: 2020. Dva goda spustya / N. N. Leetvinova, I. K. Razumova // Nauka i nauchnaya informatsiya. 2020. T. 3. № 4. S. 226–260.
8. Redkina N. S. Sovremennye tendentsii v upravlenii issledovatelskimi dannymi / N. S. Redkina // Nauchno-tehnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoy raboty. 2019. № 4. S. 1–7.
9. Yozwiak N. L., Schaffner S. F., Sabeti P. C. Data sharing: Make outbreak research open access / N. L. Yozwiak, S. F. Schaffner, P. C. Sabeti // Nature. 2015. Vol. 518. P. 477–479. doi: 10.1038/518477a.
10. Teperek M. Views on Data Stewardship – report of preliminary findings at TPM faculty: Preliminary findings report at the Faculty of Policy, Technology and Management Date: 29 January 2018. URL: https://openworking.wordpress.com/2018/01/29/viewson-data-stewardship-report-of-preliminary-findings-at-tpm-faculty (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
11. First draft of the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374837 (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
12. Shrayberg Ya. L. Formirovanie edinogo prostranstva znaniy na baze setevoy informatsionnoy infrastruktury v usloviyah stanovleniya i razvitiya sovremennoy tsifrovoy ekonomiki Ezhegodnyy doklad Chetvertogo mezhdunarodnogo professionalnogo foruma «Crimea–2018» / Ya. L. Shrayberg // Nauchnye i tehnicheskie biblioteki. 2018. № 9. C. 4–76.
13. Tapfuma M. M., Hoskins R. G. Open science disrupting the status quo in academic libraries: A perspective of Zimbabwe / М. М. Tapfuma, R. G. Hoskins // Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2019. Vol. 45. № 4. P. 406–412. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.05.005.
14. Lakizo I. G. Rost interesa sibirskih uchenyh k resursam otkrytogo dostupa / I. G. Lakizo // Trudy GPNTB SO RAN. 2019. № 2 (2). S. 44–49. doi: 10.20913/2618-75152019-2-44-49.
15. Kovyazina E. V. Tehnologii otkrytoy nauki v biblioteke nauchnogo tsentra / E. V. Kovyazina // Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i metodika elektronnogo obucheniya: tsifrovye tehnologii v obrazovanii: Materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Krasnoyarsk, 2020. S. 329–335.
16. Zasurskiy I. I., Trishchenko N. D. Infrastruktura otkrytoy nauki v Rossii i mire / I. I. Zasurskiy, N. D. Trishchenko // Nauchnye i tehnicheskie biblioteki. 2019. № 4. S. 84–100.
17. Brichkovskiy V. I. Perspektivnye napravleniya povysheniya effektivnosti informatsionnogo obespecheniya nauchnoy deyatelnosti v sovremennyh usloviyah / V. I. Brichkovskiy // Biblioteki v informatsionnom obshchestve: sohranenie traditsiy i razvitie novyh tehnologiy: Doklady III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Moskva, 2018. S. 23–32.
18. Tsvetkova V. A., Kochukova E. V. Otkrytyy dostup i nauchnaya biblioteka / V. A. TSvetkova, E. V. Kochukova // Kultura: teoriya i praktika. 2016. № 2 (11). S. 1.
19. Wilson K., Neylon C., Brookes-Kenworthy C., Hosking R., Huang C.-K. (Karl), Montgomery L., & Ozaygen A. ‘Is the library open?’: Correlating unaffiliated access to academic libraries with open access support / K. Wilson, C. Neylon, C. Brookes-Kenworthy, R. Hosking, C.-K. (Karl) Huang, L. Montgomery, & A. Ozaygen // LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries. 2019. Vol. 29. № 1. P. 1–33. doi: 10.18352/lq.10298.
20. Antopolskiy A. B. Tendentsii razvitiya nauchnyh kommunikatsiy // Elektronnoe informatsionnoe prostranstvo dlya nauki, obrazovaniya, kultury: Materialy VII Vserossiyskoy (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Orel, 2020. S. 15–26.
21. Galyavieva M. S. Nauchnye biblioteki v usloviyah otkrytogo dostupa / M. S. Galyavieva // Uchenye zapiski ISGZ. 2016. T. 14. № 1. S. 134–140.
22. Vahrushev M. V. Otkrytyy dostup: istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie i put k otkrytoy nauke / M. V. Vahrushev, M. V. Goncharov, I. I. Zasurskiy, A. I. Zemskov, K. A. Kolosov, I. I. Mihaylenko, N. D. Trishchenko, Ya. L. Shrayberg ; pod obshch. i nauch. red. Ya. L. Shrayberga. Sankt-Peterburg : Lan, 2020. 168 s.
23. IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions). 2015. IFLA Statement on libraries and intellectual freedom. URL: https://www.ifla.org/publications/ifla-statement-on-libraries-and-intellectual-freedom (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
24. UNESCO. (2019b). UNESCO recommendation on open educational resources. 40 C/32 Annex. Paris: UNESCO. URL: http://opening-up.education/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/RECOMMENDATION-CONCERNING-OPEN-EDUCATIONAL-RESOURCES.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
25. European Commission. (2015). Study on open science. Impact, implications and policy options. Brussels: European Commission. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/expert-groups/rise/study_on_open_science-impact_implications_and_policy_options-salmi_072015.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
26. OECD. Making open science a reality, OECD science, technology and industry policy papers. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. No. 25. doi: 10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en.
27. AOASG. (2019). Avstraliyskaya gruppa po strategii otkrytogo dostupa. Rezhim dostupa: https://aoasg.org.au/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
28. Mack D. C. Open access in the academy: Developing a library program for campus engagement / D. C. Mack // Grey Journal. 2020. Vol. 16. № 3. P. 181–185.
29. Fecher B., Friesike S. Open science: one term, five schools of thought // Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. Heidelberg, Springer, 2014. P. 17–45.
30. Edmunds J., Enriquez A. Increasing Visibility of Open Access Materials in a Library Catalog: Case Study at a Large Academic Research Library / J. Edmunds, A. Enriquez // Journal of Library Metadata. 2020. Vol. 20. № 2–3. P. 127–154. doi: 10.1080/19386389. 2020.1821946.
31. Taylor S. Open Access+ Service: Reframing library support to take research outputs to non-academic audiences / S. Taylor // Insights: the UKSG Journal. 2021. 33. 7. P. 1–9. doi: 10.1629/UKSG.499.
32. Laner B. Open access transition: A view through the lens of a librarian [Article@Open Access-Transformation: Ein Blick durch die Linse einer Bibliothekarin] / B. Laner // Austrian Journal of Political Science. 2021. 49. № 4. P. 15-20. doi: 10.15203/OZP.3552.VOL49ISS4.
33. European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/open-science/index.cfm? pg=open-science-cloud (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
34. Barte E., De Ochandyano Zh., Boldyreva I. S. Sovmestnoe razvitie otkrytoy nauki: portret universitetskoy biblioteki kak izdatelya / E. Barte, ZH. De Ochandyano, I. S. Boldyreva // Bibliotekovedenie. 2019. T. 68. № 5. C. 517–523. doi: 10.25281/0869-608X-2019-68-5517-523.
35. Piwowar et al. The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles / H. Piwowar, J. Priem, V. Larivière, J. P. Alperin, L. Matthias, B. Norlander // PeerJ. 2018. № 6. e4375. . doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375.
36. Costa R., Zahedi Z., Wouters P. Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective / R. Costa, Z. Zahedi, P. Wouters // Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology. 2015. Vol. 66. № 10. P. 2003–2019.
37. Priem J. Altmetrics: a manifesto. Altmetrics. 2010. URL: http://altmetrics.org manifesto (data obrashcheniya: 13.08.2021).
Review
For citations:
Redkina N.S. The libraries and Open Science: vectors of interaction. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2022;(3):105-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-3-105-126
Views:
1363
Email this article 