Foreign libraries in Web 2.0 digital community: User participation types
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-5-112-131
Abstract
Various types and formats of user participation in the key library processes like cataloging, user services, OPACs are analyzed based on science periodicals and foreign professional journals published in 2010–2020. Foreign library websites well-established within accessible digital environment has been developing, t o a g reat e xtent, a s t he p latforms f or u ser a pplications. This stimulates user extensive involvement in the key library functions like cataloging (social bookmarks, adding records and reviews) and services (social media, blogs, messengers, wiki-resources, podcsts and wordcasts). Being supported by social media resources that offer diverse channels of communication with their users, the libraries make it possible for the users to create new content and transform their services within “the unified participation framework” which is consistent with the modern digital civilization. The analysis of current practice of user participation in indexing a nd s upply o f n ew r esources a nd n ew m etadata s ets t o t he l ibraries, demonstrates that these processes have not been well developed; reviews and ratings have often to be controlled and filtered. The libraries cannot offer substitute to the Web 2 .0 a pps t hat a re in t he w ake o f g lobal d igital c ivilization. The status of social services as libraries’ additional optional services can be changed through increasing their effectiveness.
About the Author
T. E. SavitskayaRussian Federation
Tatiana E. Savitskaya – Leading Researcher
Moscow
References
1. Maness J. M. Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries // MLS, University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries. URL: https://www.webology.org/2006/v3n2/a25.html (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
2. O’Reilly T. What Is Web 2.0? Design Pattern and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. URL: http://www.oreirrynet.com/go/web2 (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
3. Thomas St. Web 2.0, Library 2.0 and the Future of Library Systems. URL: https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dispace/bitstreams/2440/14789/4/web2.0.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
4. Boateng F., Quan L. Y. Web 2.0 Applications Usage and Trends in Top US Academic Libraries. 2014. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/263245871_Web_20_applications_usage_and_trends_in_top_US_academic_libraries (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
5. Patel S. S., Bhatt A. The Application of Web 2.0 Tools in University Libraries of India // Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 2019. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335856957 (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
6. Balaj B. P., Vinay M. S., Shalini B. G. et al. Web 2.0 Use in Academic Libraries of Top Ranked Asian Universities. 2019. URL: http://www.eprints.rdis.org/33555/1/Web2.0UseinAcademicLibrariesofTopRankedAsianUniversities.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
7. Al-Qallaf Ch. L., Ridha A. A. Comprehensive Analysis of Academic Library Websites: Design, Navigation, Content, Services and Web 2.0 Tools. 2019. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325136536512_A_comprehensive_analyis_of_academic_libraries_websites_d3sign_navigation_content_services_and_web_20_tools (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
8. Kronquist-Berg M. Social Media and Public Library: Exploring Information Activities of Library Professionals and Users. 2014. URL: https://www.doria.fi/bitsteam/handle/10024/94661/kronquistmaria.pdf?sequence=2 (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
9. Rogers K. M. Academic and Public Libraries Use of Web 2.0 Applications and Services in Mississippi // SLIS Connecting. 2015. Vol. 4. Iss. 1. Article 8. URL: https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?reference. doi: 1018785/SLIS.0401.08 (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
10. Stephens M. Tagging and Social Bookmarking. Chapter 6 // Library Technology Reports. 2008. URL: http://www.journal.ala.org./on-PhD-assistant (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
11. Jeffries S. Social Cataloging Tools: A comparison and Application for Librarians // Library Hi Tech News. 25 (10). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242342125_Social_cataloging_tools_a_comparison_and_application_for_Librarians (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
12. Winzler J. LibraryThing and the Library Catalog: Adding Collective Intelligence to the OPAC // San Francisco State. URL: http://www.carl-arcl.org./ig/carlitn/9.07.2007/LTFL.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
13. Glassford-Johnson B. LibraryThing for Libraries // Bedford Public Library, Texas. 2008. URL: https://www.slideserve.com/amory/slideserve/librarything-for-libraries/powerpointppt-preservation (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
14. Hvass A. Cataloging with LibraryThing: as Easy as 1, 2, 3 // Open Research Online. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42798703_Cataloging_with_LibraryThing_aseasy_as_1_2_3 (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
15. Savitckaia T. E. Formirovanie novy`kh informatcionno-kommunikativny`kh modelei` raboty` s pol`zovatelem v ramkakh bibliotechnogo proekta Google // Observatoriia kul`tury`. 2020. № 17. № 3. C. 251–261.
16. Pirmann C. Tags in the Catalogue: Insight from a Usability Study of LibraryThing for Libraries. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/10201307.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
17. Romanovski S. Sravnitel`ny`i` analiz e`voliutcii protcessov katalogizatcii i informatcionny`kh tekhnologii` v napravlenii sozdaniia sleduiushchego pokoleniia bibliotechny`kh sistem avtomatizatcii // Nauchny`e i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2017. № 6. S. 39–57.
18. Bejune M. Wikis in Libraries // Information Technology and Libraries. 26 (3). 2013. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272658846_Wikis_in_Libraries (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
19. Farkas M. Library Success: A Best practices Wiki.2015. URL: http://www.libsuccess.org/Library_Success:_A_Best_practices_Wiki (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
20. Chang Sh.-H. Library 2.0: “Not Your Grandma’s Library” // Bridgewater Review. June 2010. URL: http://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredit=1&article=1020&comtext=br_rev (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
21. Breeding M. 2021 Library Systems Report: Advancing Library Technologies in Challenging Times. 3 May 2021. URL: https://americanlibrariessmagazine.org/2021/05/03/2021-Library-Systems-Report (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
22. Arora J. Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 and Its Applications in Library Services. URL https://library.iitd.ac.in/arpit_2020-2021/Week5–Module13–PPT–Web2.0andWeb3.0andIts20%ApplicationsinLibraryServices.pdf (data obrashcheniia: 15.02.2022).
Review
For citations:
Savitskaya T.E. Foreign libraries in Web 2.0 digital community: User participation types. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2022;(5):112-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-5-112-131