Библиотека и открытая наука: векторы взаимодействия
Abstract
Обоснована необходимость определения роли библиотек в условиях развития информационной экосистемы открытой науки. Выявлены направления деятельности научной библиотеки в зависимости от школы открытой науки (прагматическая, инфраструктурная, гражданская, демократическая, измеряющая), обеспечивающие совместную научную деятельность, доступ к информации и данным, продвижение инициатив открытой науки и др. Рассмотрены примеры деятельности библиотек, способствующие внедрению парадигмы и продвижению инициатив открытого доступа. Определены основные навыки и знания библиотекаря в области создания, распространения, обмена, продвижения ресурсов открытого доступа и предоставления услуг. Результаты исследования показывают, библиотеки имеют возможности сформировать свою ценность на рынке информационных ресурсов открытого доступа, содействовать институциональным исследованиям и участвовать в развитии школ открытой науки.
About the Author
Наталья РедькинаГосударственная публичная научно-техническая библиотека Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук
Russian Federation
References
1. Budapest Open Access Initiative. – URL: https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org.
2. Open innovation, open science, open to the world – a vision for Europe. – URL: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-singlemarket/en/news/open-innovation-open-science-open-world-vision-europe.
3. Horizon 2020: programme–guidelines to the rules on open access to scientific publications and open access to research data in Horizon 2020. 2017. – URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20180414170704/http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf.
4. Kosyakov D. V. Rossiyskaya nauka v otkrytom dostupe: sostoyaniye i tendentsii // Nauka, tekhnologii i informatsiya v bibliotekakh (Libway-2019): sbornik tezisov dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. – Novosibirsk, 2019. – S. 107-110.
5. Chigisheva O. P. Tsifrovaya gramotnost' issledovatelya v usloviyakh otkrytoy nauki // Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya. – 2018. – T. 7. – № 4 (25). – S. 241-244.
6. Trishchenko N. D. Transformatsiya sistemy nauchnoy kommunikatsii pod vliyaniyem otkrytogo dostupa: tekushchiy status, predposylki peremen, effekty i perspektivy razvitiya // Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoy raboty. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 23-34.
7. Litvinova N. N., Razumova I. K. Otnosheniye rossiyskogo nauchnogo soobshchestva k otkrytomu dostupu: 2020. Dva goda spustya // Nauka i nauchnaya informatsiya. –2020. –T. 3. – № 4. – S. 226-260.
8. Redkina N. S. Sovremennyye tendentsii v upravlenii issledovatel'skimi dannymi // Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1. Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoy raboty. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 1-7.
9. Yozwiak N. L., Schaffner S. F., Sabeti P. C. Data sharing: Make outbreak research open access // Nature. – 2015. – Vol. 518. – P. 477–479. – DOI: 10.1038/518477a.
10. Teperek M. Views on Data Stewardship – report of preliminary findings at TPM faculty: Preliminary findings report at the Faculty of Policy, Technology and Management Date: 29 January 2018. – URL: https://openworking.wordpress.com/2018/01/29/views-on-data-stewardship-report-of-preliminary-findings-at-tpm-faculty.
11. First draft of the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. – URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374837.
12. Shrayberg YA. L. Formirovaniye yedinogo prostranstva znaniy na baze setevoy informatsionnoy infrastruktury v usloviyakh stanovleniya i razvitiya sovremennoy tsifrovoy ekonomiki Yezhegodnyy doklad Chetvortogo mezhdunarodnogo professional'nogo foruma «Krym–2018» // Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki. – 2018. – № 9. – C. 4-76.
13. Tapfuma M. M., Hoskins R. G. Open science disrupting the status quo in academic libraries: A perspective of Zimbabwe // Journal of Academic Librarianship. – 2019. –Vol. 45, № 4. – P. 406-412. – DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.05.005.
14. Lakizo I. G. Rost interesa sibirskikh uchenykh k resursam otkrytogo dostupa // Trudy GPNTB SO RAN. – 2019. – № 2 (2). – S. 44-49. – DOI: 10.20913/2618-7515-2019-2-44-49.
15. Kovyazina Ye. V. Tekhnologii otkrytoy nauki v biblioteke nauchnogo tsentra // Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i metodika elektronnogo obucheniya: tsifrovyye tekhnologii v obrazovanii: Materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. – Krasnoyarsk, 2020. –S. 329-335.
16. Zasurskiy I. I., Trishchenko N. D. Infrastruktura otkrytoy nauki v Rossii i mire // Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki. – 2019. –№ 4. – S. 84-100.
17. Brichkovskiy V. I. Perspektivnyye napravleniya povysheniya effektivnosti informatsionnogo obespecheniya nauchnoy deyatel'nosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Biblioteki v informatsionnom obshchestve: sokhraneniye traditsiy i razvitiye novykh tekhnologiy: Doklady III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. – Moskva, 2018. – S. 23-32.
18. Tsvetkova V. A., Kochukova Ye. V. Otkrytyy dostup i nauchnaya biblioteka // Kul'tura: teoriya i praktika. – 2016. – № 2 (11). – S. 1.
19. Wilson, K., Neylon, C., Brookes-Kenworthy, C., Hosking, R., Huang, C.-K. (Karl), Montgomery, L., & Ozaygen, A. ‘Is the library open?’: Correlating unaffiliated access to academic libraries with open access support // LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries. – 2019. – Vol. 29. – № 1. – P. 1–33. – DOI: 10.18352/lq.10298.
20. Antopol'skiy A. B. Tendentsii razvitiya nauchnykh kommunikatsiy // Elektronnoye informatsionnoye prostranstvo dlya nauki, obrazovaniya, kul'tury: Materialy VII Vserossiyskoy (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. – Orel, 2020. – S. 15-26.
21. Galyaviyeva M. S. Nauchnyye biblioteki v usloviyakh otkrytogo dostupa // Uchenyye zapiski ISGZ. – 2016. – T. 14. – № 1. – S. 134-140.
22. Vakhrushev M. V. Otkrytyy dostup: istoriya, sovremennoye sostoyaniye i put' k otkrytoy nauke / M. V. Vakhrushev, M. V. Goncharov, I. I. Zasurskiy, A. I. Zemskov, K. A. Kolosov, I. I. Mikhaylenko, N. D. Trishchenko, YA. L. Shrayberg ; pod obshch. i nauch. red YA. L. Shrayberga. – Sankt-Peterburg : Lan', 2020. – 168 s.
23. IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions). 2015. IFLA Statement on libraries and intellectual freedom. – URL: https://www.ifla.org/publications/ifla-statement-on-libraries-and-intellectual-freedom.
24. UNESCO. (2019b). UNESCO recommendation on open educational resources. 40 C/32 Annex. Paris: UNESCO. – URL: http://opening-up.education/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/RECOMMENDATION-CONCERNING-OPEN-EDUCATIONAL-RESOURCES.pdf.
25. European Commission. (2015). Study on open science. Impact, implications and policy options. Brussels: European Commission. – URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/expert-groups/rise/study_on_open_science-impact_implications_and_policy_options-salmi_072015.pdf.
26. OECD. Making open science a reality, OECD science, technology and industry policy papers. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. – No. 25. – DOI: 10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en.
27. AOASG. (2019). Австралийская группа по стратегии открытого доступа. – URL: https://aoasg.org.au/.
28. Mack D.C. Open access in the academy: Developing a library program for campus engagement // Grey Journal. – 2020. – Vol. 16. – № 3. – P. 181-185.
29. Fecher B., Friesike S. Open science: one term, five schools of thought // Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. – Heidelberg, Springer. – 2014. – P. 17–45.
30. Edmunds J., Enriquez A. Increasing Visibility of Open Access Materials in a Library Catalog: Case Study at a Large Academic Research Library // Journal of Library Metadata. – 2020. – Vol. 20. – № 2-3. – P. 127-154. – DOI: 10.1080/19386389.2020.1821946
31. Taylor S. Open Access+ Service: Reframing library support to take research outputs to non-academic audiences // Insights: the UKSG Journal. – 2021. –33. –7. P. 1-9. – DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.499.
32. Laner B. Open access transition: A view through the lens of a librarian [Article@Open Access-Transformation: Ein Blick durch die Linse einer Bibliothekarin] // Austrian Journal of Political Science. – 2021. –49. – № 4. – P. 15-2010.15203/OZP.3552.VOL49ISS4.
33. European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). – URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm? pg=open-science-cloud.
34. Barte E., De Ochand'yano ZH., Boldyreva I. S. Sovmestnoye razvitiye otkrytoy nauki: portret universitetskoy biblioteki kak izdatelya // Bibliotekovedeniye. – 2019. – T. 68. – № 5. C. 517-523. – DOI:.10.25281/0869-608X-2019-68-5-517-523.
35. Piwowar et al., Piwowar H., Priem J., Larivière V., Alperin J. P., Matthias L., Norlander B. The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles // PeerJ. – 2018. – № 6. – e4375. – DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4375.
36. Costa R., Zahedi Z., Wouters P. Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective // Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology. – 2015. – Vol. 66, № 10. – P. 2003–2019.
37. Priem J. Altmetrics: a manifesto. Altmetrics. 2010. – URL: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.
Review
For citations:
. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2022;(3).
JATS XML
Email this article 