Preview

Scientific and Technical Libraries

Advanced search

Methods and forms of digital learning with distance education technologies: Opinions and preferences of students at the institutes of culture

https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-4-137-153

Abstract

The author continues to review the attitude of students in the speciality “Library information activities” toward methods and formats of digital learning through distance education technologies. The students of educational institutions of the RF Ministry of Culture were surveyed. Three hundred and eighty three (383) bachelor-program students and 65 masters-to-be participated in the survey. The respondents specified the methods and format of digital learning introduced during the restriction pandemic period. It is demonstrated that after these emasures had been introduced, the intensity of utilization of digital learning methods and forms increased, as well as the ratio of the so-called external methods and forms, i. e. messengers and videoconference systems. It is established that the learners prefer the systems and/or services that they know and are used to. At the same time, the dynamics of moving toward solutions integrated into digital information education environment is demonstrated. The author argues that almost every digital information education environment features some kinds of external methods and forms of digital learning with distance education technologies. The results of their application can be preserved and replicated. To make their digital learning with distance education technologies more efficient, educational institutions have to minimize external systems and look into possibility of introducing mass open online courses.

About the Author

R. R. Mukhametshin
A. Kh. Khalikov Institute of Archaeology of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences; Kazan State Institute of Culture
Russian Federation

Ramis R. Mukhametshin – Head, Information and Editorial Department, A. Kh. Khalikov Institute of Archaeology of Tatarstan Academy of Sciences; postgraduate, The Department of library and the information activity and the intellectual systems, Kazan State Institute of Culture, Republic of Tatarstan

Kazan



References

1. Ekosistemnoe reshenie dlya smeshannogo obucheniya [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://akvobr.ru/new/publications/267 (data obrashcheniya: 07.09.2021).

2. Stepanov S. Yu. Problema tsifrovizatsii i strategii razvitiya nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya / S. Yu. Stepanov, P. A. Orzhekovskiy, D. V. Ushakov // Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek. 2020. Vyp. 2 (30). doi: 10.15393/j5.art.2020.5684.

3. Bryan A. Blended learning: definition, models, implications for higher education / A. Bryan, K. N. Volchenkova // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Education. Educational sciences. 2016. Vol. 8. No 2. P. 24–30. doi: 10.14529/ped160204.

4. Babieva N. A. Potentsial vuza v protsesse obucheniya informatike i informatsionnym tehnologiyam / N. A. Babieva, T. I. Klyuchenko, Yu. N. Dresher // Nauchnye i tehnicheskie biblioteki. 2018. № 5. S. 36–46.

5. Karshiev H. Elektronnye sredstva i metody obucheniya dlya povysheniya effektivnosti uchebnogo protsessa / H. Karshiev, N. I. Aminova // Molodoy uchenyy. 2016. № 14 (118). S. 539–542.

6. Savich L. E., Shaytanova N. A., Muhametshin R. R. O vozmozhnostyah ispolzovaniya tehnologiy elektronnogo i distantsionnogo obucheniya v nepreryvnom sotsiokulturnom obrazovanii // Sotsialno-kulturnaya deyatelnost: vektory issledovatelskih i prakticheskih perspektiv: materialy Mezhdunar. elektron. nauch.-prakt. konf., 18 maya 2018 g. / KazGIK; nauch. red.: P. P. Terehov, D. V. Shamsutdinova, L. F. Mustafina. Kazan : Izd-vo Astor i Ya, 2018. S. 552–557.

7. Gushchina O. M. Psihologicheskie izmereniya dlya otsenki effektivnosti onlaynkursa v sisteme e-learning / O. M. Gushchina, A. V. Ochepovskiy // Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal. 2017. T. 6. № 4 (21). S. 301–304.

8. Mankevich Zh. B. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie osobennosti organizatsii upravlyaemoy samostoyatelnoy raboty studentov-pervokursnikov / Zh. B. Mankevich // Vestneyk Shadrinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2019. № 4 (44). S. 101–104.

9. Savitskaya T. N. Osnovy psihologii i elektronnye sredstva naglyadnosti v obuchenii inostrannym yazykam / T. N. Savitskaya // Sovremennye tendentsii v prepodavanii inostrannyh yazykov v neyazykovom vuze. 2017. № 11. S. 122–127.

10. Vasileva N. V. O povyshenii effektivnosti programmnogo obespecheniya dlya elektronnogo (E-learing) i mobilnogo (M-learing) obucheniya / N. V. Vasileva, V. V. GrigorevGolubev, I. V. Evgrafova // Morskie intellektualnye tehnologii. 2017. № 2–1 (36). S. 75–80.

11. Vasileva N. V. Primenenie elektronnoy informatsionnoy obrazovatelnoy sredy pri obuchenii v vuzah / N. V. Vasileva, N. B. Kunturova, E. A. Malygina // Vestneyk SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta Gosudarstvennoy protivopozharnoy sluzhby MChS Rossii. 2019. № 2. S. 149–158.

12. Chiganova N. V. Tehnologii razrabotki elektronno-obrazovatelnyh resursov / N. V. Chiganova, S. L. Hasanova, E. M. Devyatkin // Sovremennye naukoemkie tehnologii. 2016. № 10–1. S. 108–113.

13. Raspredelennyy vuz na osnove elektronnogo obucheniya kak sredstvo povysheniya ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti vuza / V. A. Berezovskiy, A. V. Lukyanova, A. V. Abramova, A. Yu. Astashkina // Ekonomika obrazovaniya. 2014. № 5 (84). S. 19–31.

14. Fedotov A. V. Metodologiya i osobennosti otsenki ekonomicheskogo effekta ot vnedreniya modeley tsifrovoy obrazovatelnoy sredy v sistemah srednego professionalnogo i vysshego obrazovaniya / A. V. Fedotov, E. A. Polushkina // Vestneyk Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya. 2021. T. 18. № 1. S. 62–80. doi: 10.22363/2312-8631-2021-18-1-62-80.

15. Muhametshin R. R. Metody i formy elektronnogo obucheniya i distantsionnye obrazovatelnye tehnologii v bibliotechno-informatsionnom obrazovanii: smeshannoe obuchenie 2.0 / R. R. Muhametshin // Nauchnye i tehnicheskie biblioteki. № 2. 2022. S. 91–108.

16. Muhametshin R. R. Elektronnoe, tsifrovoe, distantsionnoe, smeshannoe obuchenie – terminologicheskiy analiz // Bibliotekovedenie. 2022. T. 71. № 1. S. 103–111. doi: 10.25281/0869-608X-2022-71-1-103-111.

17. Zhukova T. V. Problemy vnedreniya informatsionno-obrazovatelnoy sredy vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy / T. V. Zhukova // Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2020. № 68–1. S. 109–113.

18. Blinov V. I. Vnezapnoe distantsionnoe obuchenie: pervyy mesyats avrala / V. I. Blinov, I. S. Sergeev, E. Yu. Esenina // Professionalnoe obrazovanie i rynok truda. 2020. № 2. S. 6–33. doi: 10.24411/2307-4264-2020-10201.

19. Rozhkova A. Yu. Imidzhevye riski pri perehode na tsifrovoe obrazovanie: vzglyad poluchateley obrazovatelnyh uslug / A. Yu. Rozhkova, M. V. Vasileva // Nauchnyy vestneyk Yuzhnogo instituta menedzhmenta. 2020. № 1 (29). S. 70–75. doi: 10.31775/2305-31002020-1-70-75.

20. Nalitkina O. V. Distantsionnoe obuchenie: osnovnye metodicheskie kategorii i podhody k realizatsii / O. V. Nalitkina, S. A. Bugaeva, L. E. Prohorova // Vestneyk obrazovaniya i razvitiya nauki Rossiyskoy akademii estestvennyh nauk. 2020. № 2. S. 100– 103. doi: 10.26163/RAEN.2020.70.23.019.


Review

For citations:


Mukhametshin R.R. Methods and forms of digital learning with distance education technologies: Opinions and preferences of students at the institutes of culture. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2022;(4):137-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-4-137-153

Views: 572


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1027-3689 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8601 (Online)