Comparative analysis of RAS Pushchino Research Center’s publication activities
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2018-6-63-77
Abstract
The authors present the study based on the data of the leading information and bibliographic resources, namely Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. The complex comparative analysis of scientific activities of the scientists of the research institutes of Pushchino Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences was accomplished. Their publication activities and citations are evaluated, and information sources used in bibliometric analysis are compared. The bibliometric study focused on the document information flow by Pushchino scientists as a special component of the information environment.
The big volume of collected data on the publication activities of RAS Pushchino Research Center enables to define the most productive and most cited authors; to correlate between publication type and citation; to reveal international contacts of the scientists and researchers; to reveal organization funding basic research; to make foundation for mining patterns in the development of research areas in physicochemical biology most significant for the Center. The case study reveals that the Russian Academy of Sciences Pushchino Research Center holds leading positions and has a promising intellectual potential.
About the Authors
E. V. Beskaravaynaya
Central Library, RAS Pushchino Research Center (RAS Library for Natural Sciences Branch)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena Beskaravaynaya, Senior Researcher
3, Institutskaya st., 142290 Pushchino, Moscow Oblast, Russia
T. N. Kharybina
Central Library, RAS Pushchino Research Center (RAS Library for Natural Sciences Branch)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana Kharybina, Senior Researcher
3, Institutskaya st., 142290 Pushchino, Moscow Oblast, Russia
References
1. Guskov A. E. Reforma rossiyskoy nauki kak impuls dlya razvitiya naukometricheskih issledovaniy (vstupitelnaya statya) // Tr. GPNTB SO RAN. – 2015. – № 9. – S. 5–13.
2. Evdokimov V. I., Gluhov V. A., Grigorev S. G. Publikatsionnaya aktivnost i naukometricheskie pokazateli statey v nauchnyh uchrezhdeniyah po psihiatrii i narkologii (2005– 2014 gg.) // Vestn. psihoterapii. – 2015. – № 56 (61). – S. 61–78.
3. Knyazeva S. Yu., Slashcheva N. A. Nauchno-tehnicheskoe sotrudnichestvo Rossii i ES: bibliometricheskiy analiz // Forsayt. – 2008. – T. 1. – № 5. – S. 30–41.
4. Marcusova V. V., Ivanov V. V., Varshavskiy A. E. Bibliometricheskie pokazateli rossiyskoy nauki i RAN (1997–2007) // Vestn. RAN. 2009. – T. 79. – № 6. – S. 483–491.
5. Marshakova-Shaykevich I. V. Rossiya v mirovoy nauke. Bibliometricheskiy analiz. – Moskva : Nauka, 2008. – 227 s.
6. Rahul Panat. On the data and analysis of the research output of India and China: India has significantly fallen behind China // Scientometrics. – 2014. – № 2. – P. 471–481.
7. Gumpenberger C., Wieland M., Gorraiz J. Bibliometric practices and activities at the University of Vienna // Library Management // 2012. – Vol. 33. – № 3. – P. 174–183.
8. Joanna Richardson, Therese Nolan-Brown, Pat Loria, Stephanie Bradbury. Library Research Support in Queensland : A Survey // Australian Academic & Research Libraries. – 2012. – Vol. 43. – Iss. 4. – P. 258–277. – DOI: 10.1080/00048623.2012.10722287.
9. Beskaravaynaya E. V., Harybina T. N. Dinahmika bibliometricheskih pokazateley sotrudnikov nauchnyh shkol Instituta belka RAN // Inform. obespechenie nauki: novye tehnologii : sb. nauch. tr. / Kalenov N. E., Tsvetkova V. A. (red.). – Moskva : BEN RAN, 2015. – S. 63–73.
10. Beskaravaynaya E. V., Harybina T. N. Konsolidatsiya uchenyh: vklad sotrudnikov, rabotayushchih za rubezhom, v tematiku nauchnyh shkol Instituta belka RAN // Inform. resursy Rossii. – 2014. – № 5 (141). – S. 27–32.
11. Beskaravaynaya E. V., Harybina T. N. Naukometricheskiy analiz chlenov dissertatsionnogo soveta odnogo iz NII Pushchinskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN // Naukovedcheskie issled. : sb. tr. RAN INION / otv. red. A. N. Rakitov, 2016. – S. 74–90.
12. Zemskov A. I. Bibliometriya: vzglyad na problemu. Sravnenie urovnya tsitirovaniya nauchnyh statey v raznyh stranah / A. I. Zemskov // Nauch. i tehn. b-ki. – 2014. – № 9. – S. 22–44.
13. Mohnacheva Yu. V., Mitroshin I. A., Beskaravaynaya E. V., Harybina T. N. Bibliometricheskiy analiz patentnogo i dokumentalno-informatsionnogo potoka v sfere nanotehnologiy organizatsiy Moskovskoy oblasti / Yu. V. Mohnacheva, I. A. Mitroshin, E. V. Beskaravaynaya, T. N. Harybina // Tam zhe. – 2016. – № 2. – S. 55–69.
Review
For citations:
Beskaravaynaya E.V., Kharybina T.N. Comparative analysis of RAS Pushchino Research Center’s publication activities. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2018;(6):63-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2018-6-63-77
Views:
562
Email this article 